Law JournalFeeds

Abstract  A single global authority is not sufficient to regulate heterogenous agents in multiagent systems based on distributed architectures,
due to idiosyncratic local situations and to the need to regulate new issues as soon as they arise. On the one hand institutions
should be structured as normative systems with a hierarchy of authorities able to cope with the dynamics of local situations,
but on the other hand higher authorities should be able to delimit the autonomy of lower authorities to issue valid norms.
In this paper, we study the interplay of obligations and strong permissions in the context of hierarchies of authorities using
input/output logic, because its explicit norm base facilitates reasoning about norm base maintenance, and it covers a variety of conditional obligations and permissions. We combine the logic with constraints, priorities and hierarchies of authorities. In this setting,
we observe that Makinson and van der Torre’s notion of prohibition immunity for permissions is no longer sufficient, and we
introduce a new notion of permission as exception and a new distinction between static and dynamic norms. We show how strong
permissions can dynamically change an institution by adding exceptions to obligations, provide an explicit representation
of what is permitted to the subjects of the normative system and allow higher level authorities to limit the power of lower
level authorities to change the normative system.