Journals

Volume 5 Issue 03

European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 5 Issue 03

The European Constitutional Law Review ( EuConst ), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process. Its Editorial Advisory Board is composed of eminent members in the field of constitutional studies from across the Continent in its new EU format.

Impact Factor*: 0.522

Relative ranking within Categories: Law 74/104

* 2008 Journal Citation Reports®, Thomson Reuters

“False But Highly Persuasive”: How Wrong Were the Probability Estimates in McDaniel v. Brown?

Distinguished Professor
and Weiss Family Scholar, Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School [...]



Same-Sex Marriage in the Heartland: The Case for Legislative Minimalism in Crafting Religious Exemptions

Assistant
Professor of Law, Drake Law School, Des Moines, Iowa. Professor Bartrum is
a [...]

Playing Catch-up in the Schoolyard? Children and Young People’s ‘Voice’ and Education Rights in the UK

This article aims to assess cross-UK progress in the recognition of the independent education rights of children and young people of school age. There is an increasing divergence between the separate education systems of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, which has become more pronounced after the devolution of power that began just over a decade ago and is accentuated by the sheer volume of legislative activity and policy developments in this field. Thus, an examination of these rights in the UK necessitates comparisons between these four jurisdictions, notwithstanding the many shared traditions in their approach to education and its governance. The article gives its principal focus to rights relating to participation in decision making and redress processes, including those concerning consultation, appeals, and complaints. Analysing recent developments across a range of key aspects of education, including the curriculum, discipline, and special and additional support needs, the author finds not only a reasonable degree of overall progress in the realization of children and young people’s autonomy interests in the field of education, from a rather low point particularly compared with child law more generally, but also a degree of disparity across the UK and a continuing cynicism about the true level of empowerment of children and young people in relation to decisions concerning their [...]

Same-sex Couples and the Law: Recent Developments in the British Isles

This article chronicles the treatment of same-sex couples in England and the Republic of Ireland in recent years in order to ascertain (i) the impact that incorporation of the European Convention into the domestic law of each State has had on the rights of same-sex couples, (ii) what the introduction of civil partnership legislation might mean for the future of the same-sex marriage debate, (iii) the position of prospective same-sex adoptive parents in each jurisdiction, and (iv) what the law is proposing for those couples who do not formalise their relationship, whether same-sex or opposite-sex. Through a comparative analysis of the many recent developments that have taken place in each jurisdiction, the article concludes (i) that when interpreted correctly by the national courts the European Convention has been of little benefit to same-sex couples since its incorporation, (ii) that civil partnership may sound the death knell for same-sex marriage, (iii) that the Irish stance on adoption by same-sex couples may be illogical in light of a recent decision handed down in Strasbourg, and (iv) that significant progress has been made as regards those opposite-sex and same-sex couples who do not marry or register their partnership, with a redress scheme for such couples at the legislative stage in the Republic of [...]



The Legal Battle against Domestic Violence in India: Evolution and Analysis

In the post-independence era, the Indian woman has been the subject of numerous laws, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 being one of the latest and certainly the most controversial addition to the list. While it has been eagerly awaited in certain sections as a step that should significantly strengthen the position of Indian women within the family unit, it has been widely criticized as being ambiguous, discriminatory, and even potentially dangerous. This article seeks to analyse this controversial legislation in the context of its socio-economic background and the legal developments that led to its enactment. Moreover, an attempt has been made to critically examine its provisions, and to highlight its implications, both positive and negative. Further, a comparison has been made between this enactment and other similar legislation in various other countries. Finally, the article seeks to put into perspective the overall impact that this legislation would have on the family unit and the social fabric of [...]

The Absolute Prohibition of Same-sex Marriages in Uganda

Before 2005, the Constitution of Uganda provided in Article 31(1) that ‘men and women of the age of eighteen years and above have the right to marry and to found a family ….’ In 2005, Article 31 was amended by inserting clause (2a) to the effect that ‘marriage between persons of the same sex is prohibited’. The author gives a historical background to Article 31(1) and shows how the Constituent Assembly treated the issue of same-sex marriages. The author also examines the circumstances leading to the absolute prohibition of same-sex marriages in the Constitution of Uganda. Drawing on social problem theory, the author argues that the absolute prohibition of same-sex marriages in Uganda could be explained by the perceived threat to the established cultural norms from emerging humanitarian [...]

‘So Hedge therefore, Who Join Forever’: Understanding the Interrelation of No-fault Divorce and Premarital Contracts

This article explores the interrelation between the availability of no-fault divorce and the enforceability of premarital contracts, exemplified by American and German law. The traditional common law doctrines in the USA and – at least with regard to spousal support – the German civil code of 1900 were similarly hostile towards premarital contracts. In both legal systems divorce was fault based. Conventional wisdom tells us that no-fault divorce and the enforceability of premarital contracts emerged together out of a spirit of liberalization. Yet, by reconstructing the history of both legal institutions, one may observe a more subtle interrelation. The vast majority of jurisdictions in the USA responded to the availability of no-fault divorce with the enforceability of premarital contracts, which reveals a causal relationship. In the case of Germany, it was already in 1938 when the lawmaker introduced through the Ehegesetz (Statute on Marriage) ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ as grounds for divorce, and at the same time legalized premarital contracts on permanent maintenance. From today’s perspective, a functional understanding of the interrelation of both legal institutions seems to be the most promising. Family law, criminal law, and tort law are in retreat as protective mechanisms against risks of opportunistic behaviour and hold-ups that may arise through the availability of no-fault divorce. Premarital contracts on the financial consequences of divorce may be apt as an instrument to protect the interests of spouses against such risks. This finding provides a sound justification for contractual freedom in this field and shows that the availability of premarital contracts should be understood as a logical corollary of the availability of no-fault [...]

The Exemption that Confirms the Rule: Reflections on Proceduralism and the UK Hybrid Embryos Controversy

Abstract  This paper provides an interpretation of the licensing provisions envisaged under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act
1990 as a model for a rule and exemption-based procedural strategy for the adjudication of potential ethical controversies,
and it offers an account of the liberal-democratic legitimacy of the procedure’s outcomes as well as of the legal procedure
itself. Drawing on a novel articulation of the distinction between exceptions and exemptions, the paper argues that such a
rule and exemption mechanism, while not devoid of attractions, is not immune from the criticisms often levied against procedural
approaches to the management of pluralism: it either has to fall back on substantive justification in ways that are not helpful
when trying to arbitrate a moral controversy, or it appears justificatorily groundless.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s11158-009-9094-2
  • Authors
    • Enzo Rossi, University of Wales, Newport Social Ethics Research Group, School of Health and Social Sciences Caerleon Campus, Lodge Road Newport NP18 3QT UK

Quantifying the Accuracy of Forensic Examiners in the Absence of a “Gold Standard”

Abstract  
This study asked whether latent class modeling methods and multiple ratings of the same cases might permit quantification
of the accuracy of forensic assessments. Five evaluators examined 156 redacted court reports concerning criminal defendants
who had undergone hospitalization for evaluation or restoration of their adjudicative competence. Evaluators rated each defendant’s
Dusky-defined competence to stand trial on a five-point scale as well as each defendant’s understanding of, appreciation of, and
reasoning about criminal proceedings. Having multiple ratings per defendant made it possible to estimate accuracy parameters
using maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches, despite the absence of any “gold standard” for the defendants’ true competence
status. Evaluators appeared to be very accurate, though this finding should be viewed with caution.

  • Content Type Journal Article
  • DOI 10.1007/s10979-009-9197-5
  • Authors
    • Douglas Mossman, Glenn M. Weaver Institute of Law and Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Clifton Avenue & Calhoun Street, PO Box 210040, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040, USA
    • Michael D. Bowen, Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA
    • David J. Vanness, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
    • David Bienenfeld, Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA
    • Terry Correll, Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA
    • Jerald Kay, Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA
    • William M. Klykylo, Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA
    • Douglas S. Lehrer, Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA