<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law JournalFeeds &#187; Harvard Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law.journalfeeds.com/category/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	    <link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/category/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/</link>
    	<description>the knowledge syndicate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-11/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-11/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Publications_8848.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 875 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 875 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-11/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Congress Delegates Power to Raise the Debt Ceiling. — Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-25, 125 Stat. 240 (to be codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/congress-delegates-power-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-%e2%80%94-budget-control-act-of-2011-pub-l-no-112-25-125-stat-240-to-be-codified-in-scattered-sections-of-the-u-s-code/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/congress-delegates-power-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-%e2%80%94-budget-control-act-of-2011-pub-l-no-112-25-125-stat-240-to-be-codified-in-scattered-sections-of-the-u-s-code/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Legislation_8838.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Congress Delegates Power to Raise the Debt Ceiling. — Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-25, 125 Stat. 240 (to be codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 867 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Congress Delegates Power to Raise the Debt Ceiling. — Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-25, 125 Stat. 240 (to be codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 867 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/congress-delegates-power-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-%e2%80%94-budget-control-act-of-2011-pub-l-no-112-25-125-stat-240-to-be-codified-in-scattered-sections-of-the-u-s-code/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Food Safety Modernization Act Implements Private Regulatory Scheme. — FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 111-353, 124 Stat. 3885 (2011) (codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/food-safety-modernization-act-implements-private-regulatory-scheme-%e2%80%94-fda-food-safety-modernization-act-pub-l-no-111-353-124-stat-3885-2011-codified-in-scattered-sections-of-the/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/food-safety-modernization-act-implements-private-regulatory-scheme-%e2%80%94-fda-food-safety-modernization-act-pub-l-no-111-353-124-stat-3885-2011-codified-in-scattered-sections-of-the/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Legislation_8828.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Food Safety Modernization Act Implements Private Regulatory Scheme. — FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 111-353, 124 Stat. 3885 (2011) (codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 859 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Food Safety Modernization Act Implements Private Regulatory Scheme. — FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 111-353, 124 Stat. 3885 (2011) (codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 859 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/food-safety-modernization-act-implements-private-regulatory-scheme-%e2%80%94-fda-food-safety-modernization-act-pub-l-no-111-353-124-stat-3885-2011-codified-in-scattered-sections-of-the/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot; Federal Circuit Holds that Mental Processes that Do Not, as a Practical Matter, Require a Computer to Be Performed Are Unpatentable. — CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-circuit-holds-that-mental-processes-that-do-not-as-a-practical-matter-require-a-computer-to-be-performed-are-unpatentable-%e2%80%94-cybersource-corp-v-retail-decisions-inc-654-f/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-circuit-holds-that-mental-processes-that-do-not-as-a-practical-matter-require-a-computer-to-be-performed-are-unpatentable-%e2%80%94-cybersource-corp-v-retail-decisions-inc-654-f/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Case_8818.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ " Federal Circuit Holds that Mental Processes that Do Not, as a Practical Matter, Require a Computer to Be Performed Are Unpatentable. — CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 851 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8221; Federal Circuit Holds that Mental Processes that Do Not, as a Practical Matter, Require a Computer to Be Performed Are Unpatentable. — CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 851 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-circuit-holds-that-mental-processes-that-do-not-as-a-practical-matter-require-a-computer-to-be-performed-are-unpatentable-%e2%80%94-cybersource-corp-v-retail-decisions-inc-654-f/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Fourth Circuit Upholds Federal Firearms Regulation. — United States v. Masciandaro, 638 F.3d 458 (4th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 10-11212, 2011 WL 2516854 (U.S. Nov. 28, 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-upholds-federal-firearms-regulation-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-masciandaro-638-f-3d-458-4th-cir-2011-cert-denied-no-10-11212-2011-wl-2516854-u-s-nov-28-2011/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-upholds-federal-firearms-regulation-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-masciandaro-638-f-3d-458-4th-cir-2011-cert-denied-no-10-11212-2011-wl-2516854-u-s-nov-28-2011/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Case_8808.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fourth Circuit Upholds Federal Firearms Regulation. — United States v. Masciandaro, 638 F.3d 458 (4th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 10-11212, 2011 WL 2516854 (U.S. Nov. 28, 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 843 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fourth Circuit Upholds Federal Firearms Regulation. — United States v. Masciandaro, 638 F.3d 458 (4th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 10-11212, 2011 WL 2516854 (U.S. Nov. 28, 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 843 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-upholds-federal-firearms-regulation-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-masciandaro-638-f-3d-458-4th-cir-2011-cert-denied-no-10-11212-2011-wl-2516854-u-s-nov-28-2011/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Fifth Circuit Holds that Undocumented Immigrants Do Not Have Second Amendment Rights. — United States v. Portillo- Munoz, 643 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-holds-that-undocumented-immigrants-do-not-have-second-amendment-rights-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-portillo-munoz-643-f-3d-437-5th-cir-2011/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-holds-that-undocumented-immigrants-do-not-have-second-amendment-rights-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-portillo-munoz-643-f-3d-437-5th-cir-2011/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Case_8798.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fifth Circuit Holds that Undocumented Immigrants Do Not Have Second Amendment Rights. — United States v. Portillo- Munoz, 643 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 835 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fifth Circuit Holds that Undocumented Immigrants Do Not Have Second Amendment Rights. — United States v. Portillo- Munoz, 643 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 835 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-holds-that-undocumented-immigrants-do-not-have-second-amendment-rights-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-portillo-munoz-643-f-3d-437-5th-cir-2011/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Unanimously Voids Foreclosure Sales Because Securitization Trusts Could Not Demonstrate Clear Chains of Title to Mortgages. — U.S. Bank National Ass’n v. Ibanez, 941 N.E.2d 40 (Mass. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/massachusetts-supreme-judicial-court-unanimously-voids-foreclosure-sales-because-securitization-trusts-could-not-demonstrate-clear-chains-of-title-to-mortgages-%e2%80%94-u-s-bank-national-ass/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/massachusetts-supreme-judicial-court-unanimously-voids-foreclosure-sales-because-securitization-trusts-could-not-demonstrate-clear-chains-of-title-to-mortgages-%e2%80%94-u-s-bank-national-ass/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Case_8788.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Unanimously Voids Foreclosure Sales Because Securitization Trusts Could Not Demonstrate Clear Chains of Title to Mortgages. — U.S. Bank National Ass’n v. Ibanez, 941 N.E.2d 40 (Mass. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Unanimously Voids Foreclosure Sales Because Securitization Trusts Could Not Demonstrate Clear Chains of Title to Mortgages. — U.S. Bank National Ass’n v. Ibanez, 941 N.E.2d 40 (Mass. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 827 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/massachusetts-supreme-judicial-court-unanimously-voids-foreclosure-sales-because-securitization-trusts-could-not-demonstrate-clear-chains-of-title-to-mortgages-%e2%80%94-u-s-bank-national-ass/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;District of Oregon Invalidates Biological Opinion for Federally Operated Dams on Columbia River. — National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, No. CV 01- 00640-RE, 2011 WL 3322793 (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/district-of-oregon-invalidates-biological-opinion-for-federally-operated-dams-on-columbia-river-%e2%80%94-national-wildlife-federation-v-national-marine-fisheries-service-no-cv-01-00640-re/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/district-of-oregon-invalidates-biological-opinion-for-federally-operated-dams-on-columbia-river-%e2%80%94-national-wildlife-federation-v-national-marine-fisheries-service-no-cv-01-00640-re/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Case_8778.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "District of Oregon Invalidates Biological Opinion for Federally Operated Dams on Columbia River. — National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, No. CV 01- 00640-RE, 2011 WL 3322793 (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;District of Oregon Invalidates Biological Opinion for Federally Operated Dams on Columbia River. — National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, No. CV 01- 00640-RE, 2011 WL 3322793 (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 819 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/district-of-oregon-invalidates-biological-opinion-for-federally-operated-dams-on-columbia-river-%e2%80%94-national-wildlife-federation-v-national-marine-fisheries-service-no-cv-01-00640-re/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Second Circuit Holds that Qualified Immunity Shields School Officials Who Discipline Students for Their Online Speech. — Doninger v. Niehoff, 642 F.3d 334 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 11-113, 2011 WL 3204853 (U.S. Oct. 31, 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-qualified-immunity-shields-school-officials-who-discipline-students-for-their-online-speech-%e2%80%94-doninger-v-niehoff-642-f-3d-334-2d-cir-2011-cert-denied-n/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-qualified-immunity-shields-school-officials-who-discipline-students-for-their-online-speech-%e2%80%94-doninger-v-niehoff-642-f-3d-334-2d-cir-2011-cert-denied-n/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Recent_Case_8768.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Holds that Qualified Immunity Shields School Officials Who Discipline Students for Their Online Speech. — Doninger v. Niehoff, 642 F.3d 334 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 11-113, 2011 WL 3204853 (U.S. Oct. 31, 2011)." 125 Harv. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Holds that Qualified Immunity Shields School Officials Who Discipline Students for Their Online Speech. — Doninger v. Niehoff, 642 F.3d 334 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 11-113, 2011 WL 3204853 (U.S. Oct. 31, 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 811 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-qualified-immunity-shields-school-officials-who-discipline-students-for-their-online-speech-%e2%80%94-doninger-v-niehoff-642-f-3d-334-2d-cir-2011-cert-denied-n/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Spare the Mod: In Support of Total-Conversion Modified Video Games&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/spare-the-mod-in-support-of-total-conversion-modified-video-games/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/spare-the-mod-in-support-of-total-conversion-modified-video-games/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Note_8758.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Spare the Mod: In Support of Total-Conversion Modified Video Games" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 789 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Spare the Mod: In Support of Total-Conversion Modified Video Games&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 789 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/spare-the-mod-in-support-of-total-conversion-modified-video-games/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carol S. Steiker,  &quot;Capital Punishment and Contingency&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/carol-s-steiker-capital-punishment-and-contingency/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/carol-s-steiker-capital-punishment-and-contingency/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Book_Review_8748.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carol S. Steiker,  "Capital Punishment and Contingency" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 760 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol S. Steiker,  &#8220;Capital Punishment and Contingency&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 760 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/carol-s-steiker-capital-punishment-and-contingency/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebecca Tushnet,  &quot;Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/rebecca-tushnet-worth-a-thousand-words-the-images-of-copyright/20120120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/rebecca-tushnet-worth-a-thousand-words-the-images-of-copyright/20120120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/january12/Article_8738.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rebecca Tushnet,  "Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 683 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca Tushnet,  &#8220;Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 683 (2012).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/rebecca-tushnet-worth-a-thousand-words-the-images-of-copyright/20120120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark A. Graber,  &quot;Hollow Hopes and Exaggerated Fears: The Canon/Anticanon in Context&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/mark-a-graber-hollow-hopes-and-exaggerated-fears-the-canonanticanon-in-context/20120111/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/mark-a-graber-hollow-hopes-and-exaggerated-fears-the-canonanticanon-in-context/20120111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/forum_778.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark A. Graber,  "Hollow Hopes and Exaggerated Fears: The Canon/Anticanon in Context" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 33 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark A. Graber,  &#8220;Hollow Hopes and Exaggerated Fears: The Canon/Anticanon in Context&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 33 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/mark-a-graber-hollow-hopes-and-exaggerated-fears-the-canonanticanon-in-context/20120111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanford Levinson,  &quot;Is Dred Scott Really the Worst Opinion of All Time? Why Prigg Is Worse Than Dred Scott (But Is Likely to Stay Out of the “Anticanon”)&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/sanford-levinson-is-dred-scott-really-the-worst-opinion-of-all-time-why-prigg-is-worse-than-dred-scott-but-is-likely-to-stay-out-of-the-%e2%80%9canticanon%e2%80%9d/20120104/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/sanford-levinson-is-dred-scott-really-the-worst-opinion-of-all-time-why-prigg-is-worse-than-dred-scott-but-is-likely-to-stay-out-of-the-%e2%80%9canticanon%e2%80%9d/20120104/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/forum_768.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanford Levinson,  "Is Dred Scott Really the Worst Opinion of All Time? Why Prigg Is Worse Than Dred Scott (But Is Likely to Stay Out of the “Anticanon”)" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 23 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanford Levinson,  &#8220;Is Dred Scott Really the Worst Opinion of All Time? Why Prigg Is Worse Than Dred Scott (But Is Likely to Stay Out of the “Anticanon”)&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 23 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/sanford-levinson-is-dred-scott-really-the-worst-opinion-of-all-time-why-prigg-is-worse-than-dred-scott-but-is-likely-to-stay-out-of-the-%e2%80%9canticanon%e2%80%9d/20120104/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Slobogin,  &quot;An Original Take on Originalism&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/christopher-slobogin-an-original-take-on-originalism/20120104/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/christopher-slobogin-an-original-take-on-originalism/20120104/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/forum_758.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Slobogin,  "An Original Take on Originalism" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 14 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Slobogin,  &#8220;An Original Take on Originalism&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 14 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/christopher-slobogin-an-original-take-on-originalism/20120104/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-12/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-12/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Publications_8728.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 682 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 682 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-12/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;D.C. Circuit Holds Corporations Not Immune from ATS Claims. — Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Nos. 09-7125, 09-7127, 09-7134, 09-7135, 2011 WL 2652384 (D.C. Cir. July 8, 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-corporations-not-immune-from-ats-claims-%e2%80%94-doe-viii-v-exxon-mobil-corp-nos-09-7125-09-7127-09-7134-09-7135-2011-wl-2652384-d-c-cir-july-8-2011/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-corporations-not-immune-from-ats-claims-%e2%80%94-doe-viii-v-exxon-mobil-corp-nos-09-7125-09-7127-09-7134-09-7135-2011-wl-2652384-d-c-cir-july-8-2011/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8718.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Holds Corporations Not Immune from ATS Claims. — Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Nos. 09-7125, 09-7127, 09-7134, 09-7135, 2011 WL 2652384 (D.C. Cir. July 8, 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 674 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Holds Corporations Not Immune from ATS Claims. — Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Nos. 09-7125, 09-7127, 09-7134, 09-7135, 2011 WL 2652384 (D.C. Cir. July 8, 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 674 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-corporations-not-immune-from-ats-claims-%e2%80%94-doe-viii-v-exxon-mobil-corp-nos-09-7125-09-7127-09-7134-09-7135-2011-wl-2652384-d-c-cir-july-8-2011/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Seventh Circuit Holds Ban on Firing Ranges Unconstitutional. — Ezell v. City of Chicago, 651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-holds-ban-on-firing-ranges-unconstitutional-%e2%80%94-ezell-v-city-of-chicago-651-f-3d-684-7th-cir-2011/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-holds-ban-on-firing-ranges-unconstitutional-%e2%80%94-ezell-v-city-of-chicago-651-f-3d-684-7th-cir-2011/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8708.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Seventh Circuit Holds Ban on Firing Ranges Unconstitutional. — Ezell v. City of Chicago, 651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 666 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Seventh Circuit Holds Ban on Firing Ranges Unconstitutional. — Ezell v. City of Chicago, 651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 666 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-holds-ban-on-firing-ranges-unconstitutional-%e2%80%94-ezell-v-city-of-chicago-651-f-3d-684-7th-cir-2011/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Federal Circuit Invalidates Diagnostic Method Claims as Drawn to &quot;Abstract Mental Processes.&quot; — Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent &amp; Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2011).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-circuit-invalidates-diagnostic-method-claims-as-drawn-to-abstract-mental-processes-%e2%80%94-association-for-molecular-pathology-v-u-s-patent-trademark-office-653-f-3d/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-circuit-invalidates-diagnostic-method-claims-as-drawn-to-abstract-mental-processes-%e2%80%94-association-for-molecular-pathology-v-u-s-patent-trademark-office-653-f-3d/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8698.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Federal Circuit Invalidates Diagnostic Method Claims as Drawn to &#34;Abstract Mental Processes.&#34; — Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent &#38; Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 658 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Federal Circuit Invalidates Diagnostic Method Claims as Drawn to &quot;Abstract Mental Processes.&quot; — Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent &#038; Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 658 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-circuit-invalidates-diagnostic-method-claims-as-drawn-to-abstract-mental-processes-%e2%80%94-association-for-molecular-pathology-v-u-s-patent-trademark-office-653-f-3d/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;D.C. Court of Appeals Allows Recovery for Emotional Harm Outside Zone of Danger. — Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic, 22 A.3d 789 (D.C. 2011) (en banc).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-court-of-appeals-allows-recovery-for-emotional-harm-outside-zone-of-danger-%e2%80%94-hedgepeth-v-whitman-walker-clinic-22-a-3d-789-d-c-2011-en-banc/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-court-of-appeals-allows-recovery-for-emotional-harm-outside-zone-of-danger-%e2%80%94-hedgepeth-v-whitman-walker-clinic-22-a-3d-789-d-c-2011-en-banc/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8678.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Court of Appeals Allows Recovery for Emotional Harm Outside Zone of Danger. — Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic, 22 A.3d 789 (D.C. 2011) (en banc)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 642 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Court of Appeals Allows Recovery for Emotional Harm Outside Zone of Danger. — Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic, 22 A.3d 789 (D.C. 2011) (en banc).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 642 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-court-of-appeals-allows-recovery-for-emotional-harm-outside-zone-of-danger-%e2%80%94-hedgepeth-v-whitman-walker-clinic-22-a-3d-789-d-c-2011-en-banc/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Ninth Circuit Holds that Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction over Company Whose Website Cultivates Significant Forum State User Base Comports with Due Process. — Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., 647 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-exercise-of-personal-jurisdiction-over-company-whose-website-cultivates-significant-forum-state-user-base-comports-with-due-process-%e2%80%94-mavrix-photo-inc-v-bran/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-exercise-of-personal-jurisdiction-over-company-whose-website-cultivates-significant-forum-state-user-base-comports-with-due-process-%e2%80%94-mavrix-photo-inc-v-bran/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8668.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Ninth Circuit Holds that Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction over Company Whose Website Cultivates Significant Forum State User Base Comports with Due Process. — Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., 647 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2011)." 125 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Ninth Circuit Holds that Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction over Company Whose Website Cultivates Significant Forum State User Base Comports with Due Process. — Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., 647 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 634 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-exercise-of-personal-jurisdiction-over-company-whose-website-cultivates-significant-forum-state-user-base-comports-with-due-process-%e2%80%94-mavrix-photo-inc-v-bran/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;D.C. Circuit Vacates District Court&#8217;s Preliminary Injunction of Federal Funding for Research Using Human Embryonic Stem Cells. — Sherley v. Sebelius, 644 F.3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-vacates-district-courts-preliminary-injunction-of-federal-funding-for-research-using-human-embryonic-stem-cells-%e2%80%94-sherley-v-sebelius-644-f-3d-388-d-c-cir-2011-quot/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-vacates-district-courts-preliminary-injunction-of-federal-funding-for-research-using-human-embryonic-stem-cells-%e2%80%94-sherley-v-sebelius-644-f-3d-388-d-c-cir-2011-quot/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8658.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Vacates District Court's Preliminary Injunction of Federal Funding for Research Using Human Embryonic Stem Cells. — Sherley v. Sebelius, 644 F.3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 626 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Vacates District Court&#8217;s Preliminary Injunction of Federal Funding for Research Using Human Embryonic Stem Cells. — Sherley v. Sebelius, 644 F.3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 626 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-vacates-district-courts-preliminary-injunction-of-federal-funding-for-research-using-human-embryonic-stem-cells-%e2%80%94-sherley-v-sebelius-644-f-3d-388-d-c-cir-2011-quot/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;(In)efficient Breach of International Trade Law: The State of the &quot;Free Pass&quot; After China&#8217;s Rare Earths Export Embargo&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/inefficient-breach-of-international-trade-law-the-state-of-the-free-pass-after-chinas-rare-earths-export-embargo/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/inefficient-breach-of-international-trade-law-the-state-of-the-free-pass-after-chinas-rare-earths-export-embargo/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Note_8648.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "(In)efficient Breach of International Trade Law: The State of the &#34;Free Pass&#34; After China's Rare Earths Export Embargo" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 602 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;(In)efficient Breach of International Trade Law: The State of the &quot;Free Pass&quot; After China&#8217;s Rare Earths Export Embargo&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 602 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/inefficient-breach-of-international-trade-law-the-state-of-the-free-pass-after-chinas-rare-earths-export-embargo/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Deweyan Democracy and the Administrative State&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/deweyan-democracy-and-the-administrative-state/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/deweyan-democracy-and-the-administrative-state/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Note_8638.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Deweyan Democracy and the Administrative State" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 580 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Deweyan Democracy and the Administrative State&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 580 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/deweyan-democracy-and-the-administrative-state/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael J. Klarman,  &quot;The Founding Revisited&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/michael-j-klarman-the-founding-revisited/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/michael-j-klarman-the-founding-revisited/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Book_Review_8628.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael J. Klarman,  "The Founding Revisited" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 544 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael J. Klarman,  &#8220;The Founding Revisited&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 544 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/michael-j-klarman-the-founding-revisited/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orin S. Kerr,  &quot;An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/orin-s-kerr-an-equilibrium-adjustment-theory-of-the-fourth-amendment/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/orin-s-kerr-an-equilibrium-adjustment-theory-of-the-fourth-amendment/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Article_8618.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orin S. Kerr,  "An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 476 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orin S. Kerr,  &#8220;An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 476 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/orin-s-kerr-an-equilibrium-adjustment-theory-of-the-fourth-amendment/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jamal Greene,  &quot;The Anticanon&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/jamal-greene-the-anticanon/20111220/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/jamal-greene-the-anticanon/20111220/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Article_8608.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jamal Greene,  "The Anticanon" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 379 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamal Greene,  &#8220;The Anticanon&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 379 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/jamal-greene-the-anticanon/20111220/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Seventh Circuit Invalidates Wisconsin Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act. — Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-invalidates-wisconsin-inmate-sex-change-prevention-act-%e2%80%94-fields-v-smith-653-f-3d-550-7th-cir-2011/20111216/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-invalidates-wisconsin-inmate-sex-change-prevention-act-%e2%80%94-fields-v-smith-653-f-3d-550-7th-cir-2011/20111216/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/december11/Recent_Case_8688.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Seventh Circuit Invalidates Wisconsin Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act. — Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011)." 125 Harv. L. Rev. 650 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Seventh Circuit Invalidates Wisconsin Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act. — Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011).&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 650 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-invalidates-wisconsin-inmate-sex-change-prevention-act-%e2%80%94-fields-v-smith-653-f-3d-550-7th-cir-2011/20111216/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;First Amendment — Freedom of Speech — Categorical Exclusions: Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-amendment-%e2%80%94-freedom-of-speech-%e2%80%94-categorical-exclusions-brown-v-entertainment-merchants-ass%e2%80%99n/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-amendment-%e2%80%94-freedom-of-speech-%e2%80%94-categorical-exclusions-brown-v-entertainment-merchants-ass%e2%80%99n/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8598.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "First Amendment — Freedom of Speech — Categorical Exclusions: Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 182 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;First Amendment — Freedom of Speech — Categorical Exclusions: Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 182 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-amendment-%e2%80%94-freedom-of-speech-%e2%80%94-categorical-exclusions-brown-v-entertainment-merchants-ass%e2%80%99n/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;First Amendment — Freedom of Speech — Campaign Finance Regulation: Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett &quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-amendment-%e2%80%94-freedom-of-speech-%e2%80%94-campaign-finance-regulation-arizona-free-enterprise-club%e2%80%99s-freedom-club-pac-v-bennett/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-amendment-%e2%80%94-freedom-of-speech-%e2%80%94-campaign-finance-regulation-arizona-free-enterprise-club%e2%80%99s-freedom-club-pac-v-bennett/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8588.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "First Amendment — Freedom of Speech — Campaign Finance Regulation: Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett " 125 Harv. L. Rev. 202 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;First Amendment — Freedom of Speech — Campaign Finance Regulation: Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett &#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 202 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-amendment-%e2%80%94-freedom-of-speech-%e2%80%94-campaign-finance-regulation-arizona-free-enterprise-club%e2%80%99s-freedom-club-pac-v-bennett/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Tushnet ,  &quot;“I Couldn’t See It Until I Believed It”: Some Notes on Motivated Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication &quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/mark-tushnet-%e2%80%9ci-couldn%e2%80%99t-see-it-until-i-believed-it%e2%80%9d-some-notes-on-motivated-reasoning-in-constitutional-adjudication/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/mark-tushnet-%e2%80%9ci-couldn%e2%80%99t-see-it-until-i-believed-it%e2%80%9d-some-notes-on-motivated-reasoning-in-constitutional-adjudication/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/forum_748.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Tushnet ,  "“I Couldn’t See It Until I Believed It”: Some Notes on Motivated Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication " 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Tushnet ,  &#8220;“I Couldn’t See It Until I Believed It”: Some Notes on Motivated Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication &#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/mark-tushnet-%e2%80%9ci-couldn%e2%80%99t-see-it-until-i-believed-it%e2%80%9d-some-notes-on-motivated-reasoning-in-constitutional-adjudication/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suzanna Sherry,  &quot;Democracy’s Distrust: Contested Values and the Decline of Expertise&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/suzanna-sherry-democracy%e2%80%99s-distrust-contested-values-and-the-decline-of-expertise/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/suzanna-sherry-democracy%e2%80%99s-distrust-contested-values-and-the-decline-of-expertise/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/forum_738.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suzanna Sherry,  "Democracy’s Distrust: Contested Values and the Decline of Expertise" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 7 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suzanna Sherry,  &#8220;Democracy’s Distrust: Contested Values and the Decline of Expertise&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 7 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/suzanna-sherry-democracy%e2%80%99s-distrust-contested-values-and-the-decline-of-expertise/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-13/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-13/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Recent_Publications_8578.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 378 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 378 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-13/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;The Statistics&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-statistics-3/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-statistics-3/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Statistics_8568.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "The Statistics" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 362 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;The Statistics&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 362 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-statistics-3/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Patent Act of 1952 — Standard of Proof: Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/patent-act-of-1952-%e2%80%94-standard-of-proof-microsoft-corp-v-i4i-ltd-partnership/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/patent-act-of-1952-%e2%80%94-standard-of-proof-microsoft-corp-v-i4i-ltd-partnership/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8558.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Patent Act of 1952 — Standard of Proof: Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 351 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Patent Act of 1952 — Standard of Proof: Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 351 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/patent-act-of-1952-%e2%80%94-standard-of-proof-microsoft-corp-v-i4i-ltd-partnership/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Freedom of Information Act — Personnel Exemption: Milner v. Department of the Navy&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-information-act-%e2%80%94-personnel-exemption-milner-v-department-of-the-navy/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-information-act-%e2%80%94-personnel-exemption-milner-v-department-of-the-navy/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8548.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Freedom of Information Act — Personnel Exemption: Milner v. Department of the Navy" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 341 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Freedom of Information Act — Personnel Exemption: Milner v. Department of the Navy&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 341 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-information-act-%e2%80%94-personnel-exemption-milner-v-department-of-the-navy/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Scope of Municipal Liability: Connick v. Thompson&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/42-u-s-c-%c2%a7-1983-%e2%80%94-scope-of-municipal-liability-connick-v-thompson/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/42-u-s-c-%c2%a7-1983-%e2%80%94-scope-of-municipal-liability-connick-v-thompson/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8538.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Scope of Municipal Liability: Connick v. Thompson" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 331 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Scope of Municipal Liability: Connick v. Thompson&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 331 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/42-u-s-c-%c2%a7-1983-%e2%80%94-scope-of-municipal-liability-connick-v-thompson/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: Skinner v. Switzer&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/42-u-s-c-%c2%a7-1983-%e2%80%94-postconviction-access-to-dna-evidence-skinner-v-switzer/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/42-u-s-c-%c2%a7-1983-%e2%80%94-postconviction-access-to-dna-evidence-skinner-v-switzer/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8528.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: Skinner v. Switzer" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 321 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: Skinner v. Switzer&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 321 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/42-u-s-c-%c2%a7-1983-%e2%80%94-postconviction-access-to-dna-evidence-skinner-v-switzer/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Personal Jurisdiction — Stream-of-Commerce Doctrine:  J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/personal-jurisdiction-%e2%80%94-stream-of-commerce-doctrine-j-mcintyre-machinery-ltd-v-nicastro/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/personal-jurisdiction-%e2%80%94-stream-of-commerce-doctrine-j-mcintyre-machinery-ltd-v-nicastro/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8518.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Personal Jurisdiction — Stream-of-Commerce Doctrine:  J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 311 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Personal Jurisdiction — Stream-of-Commerce Doctrine:  J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 311 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/personal-jurisdiction-%e2%80%94-stream-of-commerce-doctrine-j-mcintyre-machinery-ltd-v-nicastro/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Federal Preemption of State Law — Tort Law: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-preemption-of-state-law-%e2%80%94-tort-law-bruesewitz-v-wyeth-llc/20111115/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-preemption-of-state-law-%e2%80%94-tort-law-bruesewitz-v-wyeth-llc/20111115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/125/november11/Leading_Case_8508.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Federal Preemption of State Law — Tort Law: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC" 125 Harv. L. Rev. 301 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Federal Preemption of State Law — Tort Law: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC&#8221; 125 Harv. L. Rev. 301 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-preemption-of-state-law-%e2%80%94-tort-law-bruesewitz-v-wyeth-llc/20111115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen E. Sachs,  &quot;Corruption, Clients, and Political Machines&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-e-sachs-corruption-clients-and-political-machines/20110909/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-e-sachs-corruption-clients-and-political-machines/20110909/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/november10/forum_728.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen E. Sachs,  "Corruption, Clients, and Political Machines" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 62 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen E. Sachs,  &#8220;Corruption, Clients, and Political Machines&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 62 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-e-sachs-corruption-clients-and-political-machines/20110909/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trevor W. Morrison,  &quot;Libya, “Hostilities,” the Office of Legal Counsel, and the Process of Executive Branch Legal Interpretation&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/trevor-w-morrison-libya-%e2%80%9chostilities%e2%80%9d-the-office-of-legal-counsel-and-the-process-of-executive-branch-legal-interpretation/20110706/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/trevor-w-morrison-libya-%e2%80%9chostilities%e2%80%9d-the-office-of-legal-counsel-and-the-process-of-executive-branch-legal-interpretation/20110706/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/may11/forum_718.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trevor W. Morrison,  "Libya, “Hostilities,” the Office of Legal Counsel, and the Process of Executive Branch Legal Interpretation" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 62 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor W. Morrison,  &#8220;Libya, “Hostilities,” the Office of Legal Counsel, and the Process of Executive Branch Legal Interpretation&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 62 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/trevor-w-morrison-libya-%e2%80%9chostilities%e2%80%9d-the-office-of-legal-counsel-and-the-process-of-executive-branch-legal-interpretation/20110706/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter L. Strauss,  &quot;A Softer Formalism&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/peter-l-strauss-a-softer-formalism/20110627/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/peter-l-strauss-a-softer-formalism/20110627/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/june11/forum_698.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter L. Strauss,  "A Softer Formalism" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 55 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter L. Strauss,  &#8220;A Softer Formalism&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 55 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/peter-l-strauss-a-softer-formalism/20110627/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gary Lawson,  &quot;Optimal Specificity in the Law of Separation of Powers: The Numerous Clauses Principle&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/gary-lawson-optimal-specificity-in-the-law-of-separation-of-powers-the-numerous-clauses-principle/20110627/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/gary-lawson-optimal-specificity-in-the-law-of-separation-of-powers-the-numerous-clauses-principle/20110627/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/june11/forum_708.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gary Lawson,  "Optimal Specificity in the Law of Separation of Powers: The Numerous Clauses Principle" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 42 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Lawson,  &#8220;Optimal Specificity in the Law of Separation of Powers: The Numerous Clauses Principle&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 42 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/gary-lawson-optimal-specificity-in-the-law-of-separation-of-powers-the-numerous-clauses-principle/20110627/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brian Sheppard,  &quot;Calculating the Standard Error: Just How Much Should Empirical Studies Curb Our Enthusiasm For Legal Standards?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/brian-sheppard-calculating-the-standard-error-just-how-much-should-empirical-studies-curb-our-enthusiasm-for-legal-standards/20110623/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/brian-sheppard-calculating-the-standard-error-just-how-much-should-empirical-studies-curb-our-enthusiasm-for-legal-standards/20110623/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/march10/forum_688.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Sheppard,  "Calculating the Standard Error: Just How Much Should Empirical Studies Curb Our Enthusiasm For Legal Standards?" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 92 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Sheppard,  &#8220;Calculating the Standard Error: Just How Much Should Empirical Studies Curb Our Enthusiasm For Legal Standards?&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 92 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/brian-sheppard-calculating-the-standard-error-just-how-much-should-empirical-studies-curb-our-enthusiasm-for-legal-standards/20110623/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Ackerman,  &quot;Lost Inside the Beltway&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/bruce-ackerman-lost-inside-the-beltway/20110603/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/bruce-ackerman-lost-inside-the-beltway/20110603/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/may11/forum_678.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Ackerman,  "Lost Inside the Beltway" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 13 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Ackerman,  &#8220;Lost Inside the Beltway&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 13 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/bruce-ackerman-lost-inside-the-beltway/20110603/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-10/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-10/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Recent_Publications_8118.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1612 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1612 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-10/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Librarian of Congress Exempts University Professors and Film Students from DMCA Anticircumvention Provisions. — Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, 75 Fed. Reg. 43,825 (July 27, 2010) (to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 201).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/librarian-of-congress-exempts-university-professors-and-film-students-from-dmca-anticircumvention-provisions-%e2%80%94-exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/librarian-of-congress-exempts-university-professors-and-film-students-from-dmca-anticircumvention-provisions-%e2%80%94-exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Recent_Regulation_8108.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Librarian of Congress Exempts University Professors and Film Students from DMCA Anticircumvention Provisions. — Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, 75 Fed. Reg. 43,825 (July [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Librarian of Congress Exempts University Professors and Film Students from DMCA Anticircumvention Provisions. — Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, 75 Fed. Reg. 43,825 (July 27, 2010) (to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 201).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1604 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/librarian-of-congress-exempts-university-professors-and-film-students-from-dmca-anticircumvention-provisions-%e2%80%94-exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Conviction on the Basis of Spillover Prejudice. — Stewart v. State, No. 53100, 2010 WL 4226456 (Nev. Oct. 22, 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/nevada-supreme-court-reverses-conviction-on-the-basis-of-spillover-prejudice-%e2%80%94-stewart-v-state-no-53100-2010-wl-4226456-nev-oct-22-2010/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/nevada-supreme-court-reverses-conviction-on-the-basis-of-spillover-prejudice-%e2%80%94-stewart-v-state-no-53100-2010-wl-4226456-nev-oct-22-2010/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Recent_Case_8098.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Conviction on the Basis of Spillover Prejudice. — Stewart v. State, No. 53100, 2010 WL 4226456 (Nev. Oct. 22, 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1596 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Conviction on the Basis of Spillover Prejudice. — Stewart v. State, No. 53100, 2010 WL 4226456 (Nev. Oct. 22, 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1596 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/nevada-supreme-court-reverses-conviction-on-the-basis-of-spillover-prejudice-%e2%80%94-stewart-v-state-no-53100-2010-wl-4226456-nev-oct-22-2010/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Third Circuit Allows Government to Acquire Cell Phone Data Without Probable Cause. — In re The Application of the United States for an Order Directing a Provider of Electronic Communication Service to Disclose Records to the Government, 620 F.3d 304 (3d Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-allows-government-to-acquire-cell-phone-data-without-probable-cause-%e2%80%94-in-re-the-application-of-the-united-states-for-an-order-directing-a-provider-of-electronic-communicat/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-allows-government-to-acquire-cell-phone-data-without-probable-cause-%e2%80%94-in-re-the-application-of-the-united-states-for-an-order-directing-a-provider-of-electronic-communicat/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Recent_Case_8078.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Third Circuit Allows Government to Acquire Cell Phone Data Without Probable Cause. — In re The Application of the United States for an Order Directing a Provider of Electronic Communication Service to Disclose Records to the Government, 620 F.3d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Third Circuit Allows Government to Acquire Cell Phone Data Without Probable Cause. — In re The Application of the United States for an Order Directing a Provider of Electronic Communication Service to Disclose Records to the Government, 620 F.3d 304 (3d Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1580 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-allows-government-to-acquire-cell-phone-data-without-probable-cause-%e2%80%94-in-re-the-application-of-the-united-states-for-an-order-directing-a-provider-of-electronic-communicat/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA Superfund Authority to Issue Cleanup Orders Reviewable Only Under Threat of Penalty. — General Electric Co. v. Jackson, 610 F.3d 110 (D.C. Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-upholds-epa-superfund-authority-to-issue-cleanup-orders-reviewable-only-under-threat-of-penalty-%e2%80%94-general-electric-co-v-jackson-610-f-3d-110-d-c-cir-2010/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-upholds-epa-superfund-authority-to-issue-cleanup-orders-reviewable-only-under-threat-of-penalty-%e2%80%94-general-electric-co-v-jackson-610-f-3d-110-d-c-cir-2010/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Recent_Case_8068.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA Superfund Authority to Issue Cleanup Orders Reviewable Only Under Threat of Penalty. — General Electric Co. v. Jackson, 610 F.3d 110 (D.C. Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1572 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA Superfund Authority to Issue Cleanup Orders Reviewable Only Under Threat of Penalty. — General Electric Co. v. Jackson, 610 F.3d 110 (D.C. Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1572 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-upholds-epa-superfund-authority-to-issue-cleanup-orders-reviewable-only-under-threat-of-penalty-%e2%80%94-general-electric-co-v-jackson-610-f-3d-110-d-c-cir-2010/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Rethinking the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Choice of Counsel&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/rethinking-the-boundaries-of-the-sixth-amendment-right-to-choice-of-counsel/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/rethinking-the-boundaries-of-the-sixth-amendment-right-to-choice-of-counsel/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Note_8058.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Rethinking the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Choice of Counsel" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1550 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Rethinking the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Choice of Counsel&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1550 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/rethinking-the-boundaries-of-the-sixth-amendment-right-to-choice-of-counsel/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Restoring Electoral Equilibrium in the Wake of Constitutionalized Campaign Finance&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/restoring-electoral-equilibrium-in-the-wake-of-constitutionalized-campaign-finance/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/restoring-electoral-equilibrium-in-the-wake-of-constitutionalized-campaign-finance/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Note_8048.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Restoring Electoral Equilibrium in the Wake of Constitutionalized Campaign Finance" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1528 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Restoring Electoral Equilibrium in the Wake of Constitutionalized Campaign Finance&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1528 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/restoring-electoral-equilibrium-in-the-wake-of-constitutionalized-campaign-finance/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;A Chevron for the House and Senate: Deferring to Post-Enactment Congressional Resolutions that Interpret Ambiguous Statutes&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/a-chevron-for-the-house-and-senate-deferring-to-post-enactment-congressional-resolutions-that-interpret-ambiguous-statutes/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/a-chevron-for-the-house-and-senate-deferring-to-post-enactment-congressional-resolutions-that-interpret-ambiguous-statutes/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Note_8038.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "A Chevron for the House and Senate: Deferring to Post-Enactment Congressional Resolutions that Interpret Ambiguous Statutes" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1507 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;A Chevron for the House and Senate: Deferring to Post-Enactment Congressional Resolutions that Interpret Ambiguous Statutes&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1507 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/a-chevron-for-the-house-and-senate-deferring-to-post-enactment-congressional-resolutions-that-interpret-ambiguous-statutes/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Permitting Private Initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/permitting-private-initiation-of-criminal-contempt-proceedings/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/permitting-private-initiation-of-criminal-contempt-proceedings/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Note_8028.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Permitting Private Initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1485 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Permitting Private Initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1485 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/permitting-private-initiation-of-criminal-contempt-proceedings/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthew C. Stephenson,  &quot;Information Acquisition and Institutional Design&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/matthew-c-stephenson-information-acquisition-and-institutional-design/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/matthew-c-stephenson-information-acquisition-and-institutional-design/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Article_8018.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew C. Stephenson,  "Information Acquisition and Institutional Design" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1422 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew C. Stephenson,  &#8220;Information Acquisition and Institutional Design&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1422 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/matthew-c-stephenson-information-acquisition-and-institutional-design/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Abramowicz,  &quot;Orphan Business Models: Toward a New Form of Intellectual Property&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/michael-abramowicz-orphan-business-models-toward-a-new-form-of-intellectual-property/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/michael-abramowicz-orphan-business-models-toward-a-new-form-of-intellectual-property/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Article_8008.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Abramowicz,  "Orphan Business Models: Toward a New Form of Intellectual Property" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1362 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Abramowicz,  &#8220;Orphan Business Models: Toward a New Form of Intellectual Property&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1362 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/michael-abramowicz-orphan-business-models-toward-a-new-form-of-intellectual-property/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;In Memoriam: Benjamin Kaplan&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/in-memoriam-benjamin-kaplan/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/in-memoriam-benjamin-kaplan/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/In_Memoriam_7998.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "In Memoriam: Benjamin Kaplan" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1345 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;In Memoriam: Benjamin Kaplan&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1345 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/in-memoriam-benjamin-kaplan/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Ninth Circuit Holds that Excluding Men from Supervisory Positions in Women&#8217;s Prison Violates Title VII. — Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections, 610 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-excluding-men-from-supervisory-positions-in-womens-prison-violates-title-vii-%e2%80%94-breiner-v-nevada-department-of-corrections-610-f-3d-1202-9th-cir-2010-quo/20110420/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-excluding-men-from-supervisory-positions-in-womens-prison-violates-title-vii-%e2%80%94-breiner-v-nevada-department-of-corrections-610-f-3d-1202-9th-cir-2010-quo/20110420/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/april11/Recent_Case_8088.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Ninth Circuit Holds that Excluding Men from Supervisory Positions in Women's Prison Violates Title VII. — Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections, 610 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1588 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Ninth Circuit Holds that Excluding Men from Supervisory Positions in Women&#8217;s Prison Violates Title VII. — Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections, 610 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1588 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-excluding-men-from-supervisory-positions-in-womens-prison-violates-title-vii-%e2%80%94-breiner-v-nevada-department-of-corrections-610-f-3d-1202-9th-cir-2010-quo/20110420/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joseph Blocher,  &quot;Popular Constitutionalism and the State Attorneys General&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/joseph-blocher-popular-constitutionalism-and-the-state-attorneys-general/20110405/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/joseph-blocher-popular-constitutionalism-and-the-state-attorneys-general/20110405/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/november08/forum_668.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph Blocher,  "Popular Constitutionalism and the State Attorneys General" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 108 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Blocher,  &#8220;Popular Constitutionalism and the State Attorneys General&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 108 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/joseph-blocher-popular-constitutionalism-and-the-state-attorneys-general/20110405/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William J. Stuntz,  &quot;The Political Constitution of Criminal Justice&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/william-j-stuntz-the-political-constitution-of-criminal-justice/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/william-j-stuntz-the-political-constitution-of-criminal-justice/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/119/january06/Special_Republication:_Article_7988.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William J. Stuntz,  "The Political Constitution of Criminal Justice" 119 Harv. L. Rev. 780 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William J. Stuntz,  &#8220;The Political Constitution of Criminal Justice&#8221; 119 Harv. L. Rev. 780 (2006).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/william-j-stuntz-the-political-constitution-of-criminal-justice/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bert I. Huang,  &quot;Lightened Scrutiny&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/bert-i-huang-lightened-scrutiny/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/bert-i-huang-lightened-scrutiny/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Article_7918.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bert I. Huang,  "Lightened Scrutiny" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1109 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert I. Huang,  &#8220;Lightened Scrutiny&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1109 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/bert-i-huang-lightened-scrutiny/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-7/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-7/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Recent_Publications_7978.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1343 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1343 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-7/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Fifth Circuit Reaffirms that a Defendant&#8217;s Knowledge of Likely Harm to a Plaintiff in the Forum State Is Insufficient to Create Jurisdiction Under Calder v. Jones. — Clemens v. McNamee, 615 F.3d 374 (5th Cir. 2010). &quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-reaffirms-that-a-defendants-knowledge-of-likely-harm-to-a-plaintiff-in-the-forum-state-is-insufficient-to-create-jurisdiction-under-calder-v-jones-%e2%80%94-clemens-v-mcnamee/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-reaffirms-that-a-defendants-knowledge-of-likely-harm-to-a-plaintiff-in-the-forum-state-is-insufficient-to-create-jurisdiction-under-calder-v-jones-%e2%80%94-clemens-v-mcnamee/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Recent_Case_7968.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fifth Circuit Reaffirms that a Defendant's Knowledge of Likely Harm to a Plaintiff in the Forum State Is Insufficient to Create Jurisdiction Under Calder v. Jones. — Clemens v. McNamee, 615 F.3d 374 (5th Cir. 2010). " 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1335 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fifth Circuit Reaffirms that a Defendant&#8217;s Knowledge of Likely Harm to a Plaintiff in the Forum State Is Insufficient to Create Jurisdiction Under Calder v. Jones. — Clemens v. McNamee, 615 F.3d 374 (5th Cir. 2010). &#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1335 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-reaffirms-that-a-defendants-knowledge-of-likely-harm-to-a-plaintiff-in-the-forum-state-is-insufficient-to-create-jurisdiction-under-calder-v-jones-%e2%80%94-clemens-v-mcnamee/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Second Circuit Leaves Classification of Magistrate Judges&#8217; Rule 11 Sanctions Unresolved — Kiobel v. Millson, 592 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-leaves-classification-of-magistrate-judges-rule-11-sanctions-unresolved-%e2%80%94-kiobel-v-millson-592-f-3d-78-2d-cir-2010/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-leaves-classification-of-magistrate-judges-rule-11-sanctions-unresolved-%e2%80%94-kiobel-v-millson-592-f-3d-78-2d-cir-2010/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Recent_Case_7958.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Leaves Classification of Magistrate Judges' Rule 11 Sanctions Unresolved — Kiobel v. Millson, 592 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1327 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Leaves Classification of Magistrate Judges&#8217; Rule 11 Sanctions Unresolved — Kiobel v. Millson, 592 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1327 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-leaves-classification-of-magistrate-judges-rule-11-sanctions-unresolved-%e2%80%94-kiobel-v-millson-592-f-3d-78-2d-cir-2010/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;From Consensus to Collegiality: The Origins of the &quot;Respectful&quot; Dissent&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/from-consensus-to-collegiality-the-origins-of-the-respectful-dissent/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/from-consensus-to-collegiality-the-origins-of-the-respectful-dissent/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Note_7948.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "From Consensus to Collegiality: The Origins of the "Respectful" Dissent" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1305 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;From Consensus to Collegiality: The Origins of the &#8220;Respectful&#8221; Dissent&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1305 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/from-consensus-to-collegiality-the-origins-of-the-respectful-dissent/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Developments in the Law — Extraterritoriality&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/developments-in-the-law-%e2%80%94-extraterritoriality/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/developments-in-the-law-%e2%80%94-extraterritoriality/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Developments_in_the_Law_7938.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Developments in the Law — Extraterritoriality" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1226 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Developments in the Law — Extraterritoriality&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1226 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/developments-in-the-law-%e2%80%94-extraterritoriality/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benjamin I. Sachs,  &quot;Despite Preemption: Making Labor Law in Cities and States&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/benjamin-i-sachs-despite-preemption-making-labor-law-in-cities-and-states/20110321/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/benjamin-i-sachs-despite-preemption-making-labor-law-in-cities-and-states/20110321/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/march11/Article_7928.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benjamin I. Sachs,  "Despite Preemption: Making Labor Law in Cities and States" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1153 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin I. Sachs,  &#8220;Despite Preemption: Making Labor Law in Cities and States&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1153 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/benjamin-i-sachs-despite-preemption-making-labor-law-in-cities-and-states/20110321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carlos M. Vázquez,  &quot;The Unsettled Nature of the Union&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/carlos-m-vazquez-the-unsettled-nature-of-the-union/20110228/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/carlos-m-vazquez-the-unsettled-nature-of-the-union/20110228/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/june10/forum_658.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carlos M. Vázquez,  "The Unsettled Nature of the Union" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 79 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos M. Vázquez,  &#8220;The Unsettled Nature of the Union&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 79 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/carlos-m-vazquez-the-unsettled-nature-of-the-union/20110228/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen I. Vladeck,  &quot;The New Habeas Revisionism&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-i-vladeck-the-new-habeas-revisionism/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-i-vladeck-the-new-habeas-revisionism/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Book_Review_7808.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen I. Vladeck,  "The New Habeas Revisionism" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 941 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen I. Vladeck,  &#8220;The New Habeas Revisionism&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 941 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-i-vladeck-the-new-habeas-revisionism/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tara Leigh Grove,  &quot;The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/tara-leigh-grove-the-structural-safeguards-of-federal-jurisdiction/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/tara-leigh-grove-the-structural-safeguards-of-federal-jurisdiction/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Article_7798.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tara Leigh Grove,  "The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 869 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tara Leigh Grove,  &#8220;The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/tara-leigh-grove-the-structural-safeguards-of-federal-jurisdiction/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;OIRA Avoidance&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/oira-avoidance/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/oira-avoidance/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Note_7818.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "OIRA Avoidance" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 994 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;OIRA Avoidance&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 994 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/oira-avoidance/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;How Chevron Step One Limits Permissible Agency Interpretations: Brand X and the FCC&#8217;s Broadband Reclassification&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/how-chevron-step-one-limits-permissible-agency-interpretations-brand-x-and-the-fccs-broadband-reclassification/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/how-chevron-step-one-limits-permissible-agency-interpretations-brand-x-and-the-fccs-broadband-reclassification/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Note_7828.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "How Chevron Step One Limits Permissible Agency Interpretations: Brand X and the FCC's Broadband Reclassification" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1016 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;How Chevron Step One Limits Permissible Agency Interpretations: Brand X and the FCC&#8217;s Broadband Reclassification&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1016 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/how-chevron-step-one-limits-permissible-agency-interpretations-brand-x-and-the-fccs-broadband-reclassification/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Ninth Circuit Holds that Statutory Ban on Arbitration Is Nonwaivable. — Greenwood v. CompuCredit Corp., 615 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-statutory-ban-on-arbitration-is-nonwaivable-%e2%80%94-greenwood-v-compucredit-corp-615-f-3d-1204-9th-cir-2010/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-statutory-ban-on-arbitration-is-nonwaivable-%e2%80%94-greenwood-v-compucredit-corp-615-f-3d-1204-9th-cir-2010/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_Case_7838.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Ninth Circuit Holds that Statutory Ban on Arbitration Is Nonwaivable. — Greenwood v. CompuCredit Corp., 615 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1058 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Ninth Circuit Holds that Statutory Ban on Arbitration Is Nonwaivable. — Greenwood v. CompuCredit Corp., 615 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1058 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-that-statutory-ban-on-arbitration-is-nonwaivable-%e2%80%94-greenwood-v-compucredit-corp-615-f-3d-1204-9th-cir-2010/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Federal Tax Court Holds Pre-Chevron Judicial Construction of Statute Precludes Subsequent Agency Interpretation if Prior Construction Was Premised on Legislative History. — Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, LLC v. Commissioner, No. 25868-06, 2010 WL 1838297 (T.C. May 6, 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-tax-court-holds-pre-chevron-judicial-construction-of-statute-precludes-subsequent-agency-interpretation-if-prior-construction-was-premised-on-legislative-history-%e2%80%94-intermountain/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-tax-court-holds-pre-chevron-judicial-construction-of-statute-precludes-subsequent-agency-interpretation-if-prior-construction-was-premised-on-legislative-history-%e2%80%94-intermountain/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_Case_7848.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Federal Tax Court Holds Pre-Chevron Judicial Construction of Statute Precludes Subsequent Agency Interpretation if Prior Construction Was Premised on Legislative History. — Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, LLC v. Commissioner, No. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Federal Tax Court Holds Pre-Chevron Judicial Construction of Statute Precludes Subsequent Agency Interpretation if Prior Construction Was Premised on Legislative History. — Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, LLC v. Commissioner, No. 25868-06, 2010 WL 1838297 (T.C. May 6, 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1066 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-tax-court-holds-pre-chevron-judicial-construction-of-statute-precludes-subsequent-agency-interpretation-if-prior-construction-was-premised-on-legislative-history-%e2%80%94-intermountain/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;En Banc Seventh Circuit Holds Prohibition on Firearm Possession by Domestic Violence Misdemeanants to Be Constitutional. — United States v. Skoien, 614 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2010) (en banc).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/en-banc-seventh-circuit-holds-prohibition-on-firearm-possession-by-domestic-violence-misdemeanants-to-be-constitutional-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-skoien-614-f-3d-638-7th-cir-2010-en-banc/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/en-banc-seventh-circuit-holds-prohibition-on-firearm-possession-by-domestic-violence-misdemeanants-to-be-constitutional-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-skoien-614-f-3d-638-7th-cir-2010-en-banc/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_Case_7858.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "En Banc Seventh Circuit Holds Prohibition on Firearm Possession by Domestic Violence Misdemeanants to Be Constitutional. — United States v. Skoien, 614 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2010) (en banc)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1074 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;En Banc Seventh Circuit Holds Prohibition on Firearm Possession by Domestic Violence Misdemeanants to Be Constitutional. — United States v. Skoien, 614 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2010) (en banc).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1074 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/en-banc-seventh-circuit-holds-prohibition-on-firearm-possession-by-domestic-violence-misdemeanants-to-be-constitutional-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-skoien-614-f-3d-638-7th-cir-2010-en-banc/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Second Circuit Holds Within-Guidelines Child Pornography Sentence Procedurally and Substantively Unreasonable. — United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174 (2d Cir. 2010). &quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-within-guidelines-child-pornography-sentence-procedurally-and-substantively-unreasonable-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-dorvee-616-f-3d-174-2d-cir-2010/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-within-guidelines-child-pornography-sentence-procedurally-and-substantively-unreasonable-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-dorvee-616-f-3d-174-2d-cir-2010/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_Case_7868.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Holds Within-Guidelines Child Pornography Sentence Procedurally and Substantively Unreasonable. — United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174 (2d Cir. 2010). " 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1082 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Holds Within-Guidelines Child Pornography Sentence Procedurally and Substantively Unreasonable. — United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174 (2d Cir. 2010). &#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1082 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-within-guidelines-child-pornography-sentence-procedurally-and-substantively-unreasonable-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-dorvee-616-f-3d-174-2d-cir-2010/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Seventh Circuit Upholds Endorsement and Personal Solicitation Clauses of Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct. — Siefert v. Alexander, 608 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-upholds-endorsement-and-personal-solicitation-clauses-of-wisconsin-code-of-judicial-conduct-%e2%80%94-siefert-v-alexander-608-f-3d-974-7th-cir-2010/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-upholds-endorsement-and-personal-solicitation-clauses-of-wisconsin-code-of-judicial-conduct-%e2%80%94-siefert-v-alexander-608-f-3d-974-7th-cir-2010/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_Case_7878.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Seventh Circuit Upholds Endorsement and Personal Solicitation Clauses of Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct. — Siefert v. Alexander, 608 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1090 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Seventh Circuit Upholds Endorsement and Personal Solicitation Clauses of Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct. — Siefert v. Alexander, 608 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1090 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-upholds-endorsement-and-personal-solicitation-clauses-of-wisconsin-code-of-judicial-conduct-%e2%80%94-siefert-v-alexander-608-f-3d-974-7th-cir-2010/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;International Court of Justice Concludes that Kosovo&#8217;s Unilateral Declaration of Independence Did Not Violate International Law. — Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion (July 22, 2010), http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15987.pdf.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/international-court-of-justice-concludes-that-kosovos-unilateral-declaration-of-independence-did-not-violate-international-law-%e2%80%94-accordance-with-international-law-of-unilateral-declar/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/international-court-of-justice-concludes-that-kosovos-unilateral-declaration-of-independence-did-not-violate-international-law-%e2%80%94-accordance-with-international-law-of-unilateral-declar/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_International_Advisory_Opinion_7888.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "International Court of Justice Concludes that Kosovo's Unilateral Declaration of Independence Did Not Violate International Law. — Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;International Court of Justice Concludes that Kosovo&#8217;s Unilateral Declaration of Independence Did Not Violate International Law. — Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion (July 22, 2010), http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/15987.pdf.&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1098 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/international-court-of-justice-concludes-that-kosovos-unilateral-declaration-of-independence-did-not-violate-international-law-%e2%80%94-accordance-with-international-law-of-unilateral-declar/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-8/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-8/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Recent_Publications_7898.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1106 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1106 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-8/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;The State&#8217;s Vicarious Liability for the Actions of the City&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-states-vicarious-liability-for-the-actions-of-the-city/20110218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-states-vicarious-liability-for-the-actions-of-the-city/20110218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/february11/Note_7908.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "The State's Vicarious Liability for the Actions of the City" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1036 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;The State&#8217;s Vicarious Liability for the Actions of the City&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1036 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-states-vicarious-liability-for-the-actions-of-the-city/20110218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Josh Chafetz,  &quot;The Political Animal and the Ethics of Constitutional Commitment&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/josh-chafetz-the-political-animal-and-the-ethics-of-constitutional-commitment/20110211/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/josh-chafetz-the-political-animal-and-the-ethics-of-constitutional-commitment/20110211/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/forum_648.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh Chafetz,  "The Political Animal and the Ethics of Constitutional Commitment" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh Chafetz,  &#8220;The Political Animal and the Ethics of Constitutional Commitment&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/josh-chafetz-the-political-animal-and-the-ethics-of-constitutional-commitment/20110211/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-9/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-9/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Recent_Publications_7788.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 867 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 867 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-9/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Second Circuit Holds that Law Barring ACORN from Receiving Federal Funding Is Not a Bill of Attainder. — ACORN v. United States, 618 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-law-barring-acorn-from-receiving-federal-funding-is-not-a-bill-of-attainder-%e2%80%94-acorn-v-united-states-618-f-3d-125-2d-cir-2010/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-law-barring-acorn-from-receiving-federal-funding-is-not-a-bill-of-attainder-%e2%80%94-acorn-v-united-states-618-f-3d-125-2d-cir-2010/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Recent_Case_7778.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Holds that Law Barring ACORN from Receiving Federal Funding Is Not a Bill of Attainder. — ACORN v. United States, 618 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 859 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Holds that Law Barring ACORN from Receiving Federal Funding Is Not a Bill of Attainder. — ACORN v. United States, 618 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 859 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-law-barring-acorn-from-receiving-federal-funding-is-not-a-bill-of-attainder-%e2%80%94-acorn-v-united-states-618-f-3d-125-2d-cir-2010/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Second Circuit Holds that an Album of Music Is a Compilation. — Bryant v. Media Right Productions, Inc., 603 F.3d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, No. 10-415, 2010 WL 3740393 (U.S. Nov. 29, 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-an-album-of-music-is-a-compilation-%e2%80%94-bryant-v-media-right-productions-inc-603-f-3d-135-2d-cir-cert-denied-no-10-415-2010-wl-3740393-u-s-nov-29/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-an-album-of-music-is-a-compilation-%e2%80%94-bryant-v-media-right-productions-inc-603-f-3d-135-2d-cir-cert-denied-no-10-415-2010-wl-3740393-u-s-nov-29/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Recent_Case_7768.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Holds that an Album of Music Is a Compilation. — Bryant v. Media Right Productions, Inc., 603 F.3d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, No. 10-415, 2010 WL 3740393 (U.S. Nov. 29, 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 851 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Holds that an Album of Music Is a Compilation. — Bryant v. Media Right Productions, Inc., 603 F.3d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, No. 10-415, 2010 WL 3740393 (U.S. Nov. 29, 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 851 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-holds-that-an-album-of-music-is-a-compilation-%e2%80%94-bryant-v-media-right-productions-inc-603-f-3d-135-2d-cir-cert-denied-no-10-415-2010-wl-3740393-u-s-nov-29/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Fourth Circuit Holds that a Regulation Largely Prohibiting Alcohol Advertisements in College Newspapers Is Constitutional. — Educational Media Co. at Virginia Tech v. Swecker, 602 F.3d 583 (4th Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-a-regulation-largely-prohibiting-alcohol-advertisements-in-college-newspapers-is-constitutional-%e2%80%94-educational-media-co-at-virginia-tech-v-swecker-602-f-3d-5/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-a-regulation-largely-prohibiting-alcohol-advertisements-in-college-newspapers-is-constitutional-%e2%80%94-educational-media-co-at-virginia-tech-v-swecker-602-f-3d-5/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Recent_Case_7758.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fourth Circuit Holds that a Regulation Largely Prohibiting Alcohol Advertisements in College Newspapers Is Constitutional. — Educational Media Co. at Virginia Tech v. Swecker, 602 F.3d 583 (4th Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 843 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fourth Circuit Holds that a Regulation Largely Prohibiting Alcohol Advertisements in College Newspapers Is Constitutional. — Educational Media Co. at Virginia Tech v. Swecker, 602 F.3d 583 (4th Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 843 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-a-regulation-largely-prohibiting-alcohol-advertisements-in-college-newspapers-is-constitutional-%e2%80%94-educational-media-co-at-virginia-tech-v-swecker-602-f-3d-5/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Second Circuit Strikes Down the FCC&#8217;s Indecency Policy as Void for Vagueness. — Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 613 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-strikes-down-the-fccs-indecency-policy-as-void-for-vagueness-%e2%80%94-fox-television-stations-inc-v-fcc-613-f-3d-317-2d-cir-2010/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-strikes-down-the-fccs-indecency-policy-as-void-for-vagueness-%e2%80%94-fox-television-stations-inc-v-fcc-613-f-3d-317-2d-cir-2010/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Recent_Case_7748.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Strikes Down the FCC's Indecency Policy as Void for Vagueness. — Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 613 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2010)." 124 Harv. L. Rev. 835 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Strikes Down the FCC&#8217;s Indecency Policy as Void for Vagueness. — Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 613 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 835 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-strikes-down-the-fccs-indecency-policy-as-void-for-vagueness-%e2%80%94-fox-television-stations-inc-v-fcc-613-f-3d-317-2d-cir-2010/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;D.C. Circuit Deems Warrantless Use of GPS Device an Unreasonable Search. — United States v. Maynard, 615 F.3d 544 (D.C. Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, No. 08-3034, 2010 WL 4703743 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 19, 2010), cert. denied, No. 10-7102, 2010 WL 4156203 (U.S. Nov. 29, 2010).&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-deems-warrantless-use-of-gps-device-an-unreasonable-search-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-maynard-615-f-3d-544-d-c-cir-reh%e2%80%99g-en-banc-denied-no-08-3034-2010-wl-4703743/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-deems-warrantless-use-of-gps-device-an-unreasonable-search-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-maynard-615-f-3d-544-d-c-cir-reh%e2%80%99g-en-banc-denied-no-08-3034-2010-wl-4703743/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Recent_Case_7738.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Deems Warrantless Use of GPS Device an Unreasonable Search. — United States v. Maynard, 615 F.3d 544 (D.C. Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, No. 08-3034, 2010 WL 4703743 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 19, 2010), cert. denied, No. 10-7102, 2010 WL [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Deems Warrantless Use of GPS Device an Unreasonable Search. — United States v. Maynard, 615 F.3d 544 (D.C. Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, No. 08-3034, 2010 WL 4703743 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 19, 2010), cert. denied, No. 10-7102, 2010 WL 4156203 (U.S. Nov. 29, 2010).&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 827 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-deems-warrantless-use-of-gps-device-an-unreasonable-search-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-maynard-615-f-3d-544-d-c-cir-reh%e2%80%99g-en-banc-denied-no-08-3034-2010-wl-4703743/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Three&#8217;s a Crowd — Defending the Binary Approach to Government Speech&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/threes-a-crowd-%e2%80%94-defending-the-binary-approach-to-government-speech/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/threes-a-crowd-%e2%80%94-defending-the-binary-approach-to-government-speech/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Note_7728.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Three's a Crowd — Defending the Binary Approach to Government Speech" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 805 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Three&#8217;s a Crowd — Defending the Binary Approach to Government Speech&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 805 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/threes-a-crowd-%e2%80%94-defending-the-binary-approach-to-government-speech/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kenji Yoshino,  &quot;The New Equal Protection&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/kenji-yoshino-the-new-equal-protection/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/kenji-yoshino-the-new-equal-protection/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Article_7718.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenji Yoshino,  "The New Equal Protection" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 747 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenji Yoshino,  &#8220;The New Equal Protection&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 747 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/kenji-yoshino-the-new-equal-protection/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daryl J. Levinson,  &quot;Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/daryl-j-levinson-parchment-and-politics-the-positive-puzzle-of-constitutional-commitment/20110120/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/daryl-j-levinson-parchment-and-politics-the-positive-puzzle-of-constitutional-commitment/20110120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/january11/Article_7708.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daryl J. Levinson,  "Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 657 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl J. Levinson,  &#8220;Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 657 (2011).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/daryl-j-levinson-parchment-and-politics-the-positive-puzzle-of-constitutional-commitment/20110120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice David H. Souter,  &quot;Harvard University&#8217;s 359th Commencement Address&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/justice-david-h-souter-harvard-universitys-359th-commencement-address/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/justice-david-h-souter-harvard-universitys-359th-commencement-address/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Address_7588.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice David H. Souter,  "Harvard University's 359th Commencement Address" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 429 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice David H. Souter,  &#8220;Harvard University&#8217;s 359th Commencement Address&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 429 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/justice-david-h-souter-harvard-universitys-359th-commencement-address/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louis Kaplow,  &quot;Why (Ever) Define Markets?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/louis-kaplow-why-ever-define-markets/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/louis-kaplow-why-ever-define-markets/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Article_7598.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis Kaplow,  "Why (Ever) Define Markets?" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 437 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis Kaplow,  &#8220;Why (Ever) Define Markets?&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 437 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/louis-kaplow-why-ever-define-markets/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gideon Parchomovsky and Alex Stein,  &quot;The Distortionary Effect of Evidence on Primary Behavior&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/gideon-parchomovsky-and-alex-stein-the-distortionary-effect-of-evidence-on-primary-behavior/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/gideon-parchomovsky-and-alex-stein-the-distortionary-effect-of-evidence-on-primary-behavior/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Essay_7608.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gideon Parchomovsky and Alex Stein,  "The Distortionary Effect of Evidence on Primary Behavior" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 518 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gideon Parchomovsky and Alex Stein,  &#8220;The Distortionary Effect of Evidence on Primary Behavior&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 518 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/gideon-parchomovsky-and-alex-stein-the-distortionary-effect-of-evidence-on-primary-behavior/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Too Sovereign to Be Sued: Immunity of Central Banks in Times of Financial Crisis&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/too-sovereign-to-be-sued-immunity-of-central-banks-in-times-of-financial-crisis/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/too-sovereign-to-be-sued-immunity-of-central-banks-in-times-of-financial-crisis/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Note_7618.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Too Sovereign to Be Sued: Immunity of Central Banks in Times of Financial Crisis" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 550 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Too Sovereign to Be Sued: Immunity of Central Banks in Times of Financial Crisis&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 550 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/too-sovereign-to-be-sued-immunity-of-central-banks-in-times-of-financial-crisis/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Educational Benefits Realized: Universities&#8217; Post-Admissions Policies and the Diversity Rationale&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/educational-benefits-realized-universities-post-admissions-policies-and-the-diversity-rationale/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/educational-benefits-realized-universities-post-admissions-policies-and-the-diversity-rationale/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Note_7628.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Educational Benefits Realized: Universities' Post-Admissions Policies and the Diversity Rationale" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 572 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Educational Benefits Realized: Universities&#8217; Post-Admissions Policies and the Diversity Rationale&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 572 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/educational-benefits-realized-universities-post-admissions-policies-and-the-diversity-rationale/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Chevron and the Substantive Canons: A Categorical Distinction&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/chevron-and-the-substantive-canons-a-categorical-distinction/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/chevron-and-the-substantive-canons-a-categorical-distinction/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Note_7638.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Chevron and the Substantive Canons: A Categorical Distinction" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 594 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Chevron and the Substantive Canons: A Categorical Distinction&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 594 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/chevron-and-the-substantive-canons-a-categorical-distinction/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Fourth Circuit Holds that Republishing Social Security Numbers Gleaned from Online Public Records Is Protected Speech. — Ostergren v. Cuccinelli, 615 F.3d 263 (4th Cir. 2010). &quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-republishing-social-security-numbers-gleaned-from-online-public-records-is-protected-speech-%e2%80%94-ostergren-v-cuccinelli-615-f-3d-263-4th-cir-2010/20101217/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-republishing-social-security-numbers-gleaned-from-online-public-records-is-protected-speech-%e2%80%94-ostergren-v-cuccinelli-615-f-3d-263-4th-cir-2010/20101217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/december10/Recent_Case_7648.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fourth Circuit Holds that Republishing Social Security Numbers Gleaned from Online Public Records Is Protected Speech. — Ostergren v. Cuccinelli, 615 F.3d 263 (4th Cir. 2010). " 124 Harv. L. Rev. 616 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fourth Circuit Holds that Republishing Social Security Numbers Gleaned from Online Public Records Is Protected Speech. — Ostergren v. Cuccinelli, 615 F.3d 263 (4th Cir. 2010). &#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 616 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-republishing-social-security-numbers-gleaned-from-online-public-records-is-protected-speech-%e2%80%94-ostergren-v-cuccinelli-615-f-3d-263-4th-cir-2010/20101217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthew J. Lindsay,  &#8220;In Search of &quot;Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism&quot;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/matthew-j-lindsay-in-search-of-laissez-faire-constitutionalism/20101209/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/matthew-j-lindsay-in-search-of-laissez-faire-constitutionalism/20101209/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/march10/forum_638.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew J. Lindsay,  "In Search of &#34;Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism&#34;" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 55 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew J. Lindsay,  &#8220;In Search of &quot;Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism&quot;&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 55 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/matthew-j-lindsay-in-search-of-laissez-faire-constitutionalism/20101209/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Recent Publications&quot;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-6/20101119/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-6/20101119/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/124/november10/Recent_Publications_7578.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 124 Harv. L. Rev. 427 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 124 Harv. L. Rev. 427 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-6/20101119/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

