<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law JournalFeeds &#187; Harvard Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law.journalfeeds.com/category/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/category/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/</link>
		<description>the knowledge syndicate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:04:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Barton Beebe,  &#8220;Intellectual Property Law and the Sumptuary Code&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/barton-beebe-intellectual-property-law-and-the-sumptuary-code/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/barton-beebe-intellectual-property-law-and-the-sumptuary-code/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Article_6838.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barton Beebe,  "Intellectual Property Law and the Sumptuary Code" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 809 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barton Beebe,  &#8220;Intellectual Property Law and the Sumptuary Code&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 809 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/barton-beebe-intellectual-property-law-and-the-sumptuary-code/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edward Rubin,  &#8220;The Possibilities and Limitations of Privatization&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/edward-rubin-the-possibilities-and-limitations-of-privatization/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/edward-rubin-the-possibilities-and-limitations-of-privatization/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Book_Review_6839.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward Rubin,  "The Possibilities and Limitations of Privatization" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 890 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Rubin,  &#8220;The Possibilities and Limitations of Privatization&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 890 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/edward-rubin-the-possibilities-and-limitations-of-privatization/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Prosecutorial Power and the Legitimacy of the Military Justice System&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/prosecutorial-power-and-the-legitimacy-of-the-military-justice-system/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/prosecutorial-power-and-the-legitimacy-of-the-military-justice-system/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Note_6840.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Prosecutorial Power and the Legitimacy of the Military Justice System" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 937 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Prosecutorial Power and the Legitimacy of the Military Justice System&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 937 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/prosecutorial-power-and-the-legitimacy-of-the-military-justice-system/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Badging: Section 230 Immunity in a Web 2.0 World&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/badging-section-230-immunity-in-a-web-2-0-world/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/badging-section-230-immunity-in-a-web-2-0-world/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Note_6842.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Badging: Section 230 Immunity in a Web 2.0 World" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 981 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Badging: Section 230 Immunity in a Web 2.0 World&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 981 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/badging-section-230-immunity-in-a-web-2-0-world/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Making Ballot Initiatives Work: Some Assembly Required&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/making-ballot-initiatives-work-some-assembly-required/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/making-ballot-initiatives-work-some-assembly-required/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Note_6841.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Making Ballot Initiatives Work: Some Assembly Required" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1011 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Making Ballot Initiatives Work: Some Assembly Required&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1011 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/making-ballot-initiatives-work-some-assembly-required/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;En Banc Ninth Circuit Holds that the Government Should Waive Reliance on Plain View Doctrine in Digital Contexts. — United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 579 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/en-banc-ninth-circuit-holds-that-the-government-should-waive-reliance-on-plain-view-doctrine-in-digital-contexts-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-comprehensive-drug-testing-inc-579-f-3d-989-9th-cir/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/en-banc-ninth-circuit-holds-that-the-government-should-waive-reliance-on-plain-view-doctrine-in-digital-contexts-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-comprehensive-drug-testing-inc-579-f-3d-989-9th-cir/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Case_6843.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "En Banc Ninth Circuit Holds that the Government Should Waive Reliance on Plain View Doctrine in Digital Contexts. — United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 579 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1003 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;En Banc Ninth Circuit Holds that the Government Should Waive Reliance on Plain View Doctrine in Digital Contexts. — United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 579 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1003 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/en-banc-ninth-circuit-holds-that-the-government-should-waive-reliance-on-plain-view-doctrine-in-digital-contexts-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-comprehensive-drug-testing-inc-579-f-3d-989-9th-cir/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Maryland Court of Appeals Sets Out Process Required Before Court May Compel Identification of Anonymous Internet Defendants. — Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. Brodie, 966 A.2d 432 (Md. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/maryland-court-of-appeals-sets-out-process-required-before-court-may-compel-identification-of-anonymous-internet-defendants-%e2%80%94-independent-newspapers-inc-v-brodie-966-a-2d-432-md-2009/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/maryland-court-of-appeals-sets-out-process-required-before-court-may-compel-identification-of-anonymous-internet-defendants-%e2%80%94-independent-newspapers-inc-v-brodie-966-a-2d-432-md-2009/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Case_6844.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Maryland Court of Appeals Sets Out Process Required Before Court May Compel Identification of Anonymous Internet Defendants. — Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. Brodie, 966 A.2d 432 (Md. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1011 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Maryland Court of Appeals Sets Out Process Required Before Court May Compel Identification of Anonymous Internet Defendants. — Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. Brodie, 966 A.2d 432 (Md. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1011 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/maryland-court-of-appeals-sets-out-process-required-before-court-may-compel-identification-of-anonymous-internet-defendants-%e2%80%94-independent-newspapers-inc-v-brodie-966-a-2d-432-md-2009/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fifth Circuit Equally Divides on Decision To Uphold Judgment Against District Attorney&#8217;s Office for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence. — Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2009) (en banc).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-equally-divides-on-decision-to-uphold-judgment-against-district-attorneys-office-for-withholding-exculpatory-evidence-%e2%80%94-thompson-v-connick-578-f-3d-293-5th-cir-2009-e/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-equally-divides-on-decision-to-uphold-judgment-against-district-attorneys-office-for-withholding-exculpatory-evidence-%e2%80%94-thompson-v-connick-578-f-3d-293-5th-cir-2009-e/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Case_6845.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fifth Circuit Equally Divides on Decision To Uphold Judgment Against District Attorney's Office for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence. — Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2009) (en banc)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1019 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fifth Circuit Equally Divides on Decision To Uphold Judgment Against District Attorney&#8217;s Office for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence. — Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2009) (en banc).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1019 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-equally-divides-on-decision-to-uphold-judgment-against-district-attorneys-office-for-withholding-exculpatory-evidence-%e2%80%94-thompson-v-connick-578-f-3d-293-5th-cir-2009-e/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Third Circuit Issues Split Decision in Case Involving Gay Man&#8217;s Harassment Claims. — Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc., No. 07-3997, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19350 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2009).  &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-issues-split-decision-in-case-involving-gay-mans-harassment-claims-%e2%80%94-prowel-v-wise-business-forms-inc-no-07-3997-2009-u-s-app-lexis-19350-3d-cir-aug-28-2009/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-issues-split-decision-in-case-involving-gay-mans-harassment-claims-%e2%80%94-prowel-v-wise-business-forms-inc-no-07-3997-2009-u-s-app-lexis-19350-3d-cir-aug-28-2009/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Case_6846.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Third Circuit Issues Split Decision in Case Involving Gay Man's Harassment Claims. — Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc., No. 07-3997, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19350 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2009).  " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1027 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Third Circuit Issues Split Decision in Case Involving Gay Man&#8217;s Harassment Claims. — Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc., No. 07-3997, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19350 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2009).  &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1027 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-issues-split-decision-in-case-involving-gay-mans-harassment-claims-%e2%80%94-prowel-v-wise-business-forms-inc-no-07-3997-2009-u-s-app-lexis-19350-3d-cir-aug-28-2009/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fourth Circuit Upholds Award of Punitive but Not Statutory Damages. — Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium, Ltd., 560 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2009). &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-upholds-award-of-punitive-but-not-statutory-damages-%e2%80%94-van-alstyne-v-electronic-scriptorium-ltd-560-f-3d-199-4th-cir-2009/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-upholds-award-of-punitive-but-not-statutory-damages-%e2%80%94-van-alstyne-v-electronic-scriptorium-ltd-560-f-3d-199-4th-cir-2009/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Case_6847.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fourth Circuit Upholds Award of Punitive but Not Statutory Damages. — Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium, Ltd., 560 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2009). " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1035 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fourth Circuit Upholds Award of Punitive but Not Statutory Damages. — Van Alstyne v. Electronic Scriptorium, Ltd., 560 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2009). &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1035 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-upholds-award-of-punitive-but-not-statutory-damages-%e2%80%94-van-alstyne-v-electronic-scriptorium-ltd-560-f-3d-199-4th-cir-2009/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Ninth Circuit Holds Montana Election Contribution Disclosure Requirements Unconstitutional as Applied to De Minimis Contributions. — Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church of East Helena, Inc. v. Unsworth, 556 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-montana-election-contribution-disclosure-requirements-unconstitutional-as-applied-to-de-minimis-contributions-%e2%80%94-canyon-ferry-road-baptist-church-of-east-helena-inc-v/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-montana-election-contribution-disclosure-requirements-unconstitutional-as-applied-to-de-minimis-contributions-%e2%80%94-canyon-ferry-road-baptist-church-of-east-helena-inc-v/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Case_6848.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Ninth Circuit Holds Montana Election Contribution Disclosure Requirements Unconstitutional as Applied to De Minimis Contributions. — Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church of East Helena, Inc. v. Unsworth, 556 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1043 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Ninth Circuit Holds Montana Election Contribution Disclosure Requirements Unconstitutional as Applied to De Minimis Contributions. — Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church of East Helena, Inc. v. Unsworth, 556 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1043 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-holds-montana-election-contribution-disclosure-requirements-unconstitutional-as-applied-to-de-minimis-contributions-%e2%80%94-canyon-ferry-road-baptist-church-of-east-helena-inc-v/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;President Obama Issues First Constitutional Signing Statement, Declares Appropriations Bill Provisions Unenforceable. — Statement on Signing the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, Daily Comp. Pres. Doc. No. DCPD200900145 (Mar. 11, 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/president-obama-issues-first-constitutional-signing-statement-declares-appropriations-bill-provisions-unenforceable-%e2%80%94-statement-on-signing-the-omnibus-appropriations-act-2009-daily-comp/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/president-obama-issues-first-constitutional-signing-statement-declares-appropriations-bill-provisions-unenforceable-%e2%80%94-statement-on-signing-the-omnibus-appropriations-act-2009-daily-comp/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Signing_Statement_6849.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "President Obama Issues First Constitutional Signing Statement, Declares Appropriations Bill Provisions Unenforceable. — Statement on Signing the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, Daily Comp. Pres. Doc. No. DCPD200900145 (Mar. 11, 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1051 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;President Obama Issues First Constitutional Signing Statement, Declares Appropriations Bill Provisions Unenforceable. — Statement on Signing the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, Daily Comp. Pres. Doc. No. DCPD200900145 (Mar. 11, 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1051 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/president-obama-issues-first-constitutional-signing-statement-declares-appropriations-bill-provisions-unenforceable-%e2%80%94-statement-on-signing-the-omnibus-appropriations-act-2009-daily-comp/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Recent Publications&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-2/20100222/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-2/20100222/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/february10/Recent_Publications_6850.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1059 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1059 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-2/20100222/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jide O. Nzelibe and Matthew C. Stephenson,  &#8220;Complementary Constraints: Separation of Powers, Rational Voting, and Constitutional Design&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/jide-o-nzelibe-and-matthew-c-stephenson-complementary-constraints-separation-of-powers-rational-voting-and-constitutional-design/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/jide-o-nzelibe-and-matthew-c-stephenson-complementary-constraints-separation-of-powers-rational-voting-and-constitutional-design/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Article_6747.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jide O. Nzelibe and Matthew C. Stephenson,  "Complementary Constraints: Separation of Powers, Rational Voting, and Constitutional Design" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 617 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jide O. Nzelibe and Matthew C. Stephenson,  &#8220;Complementary Constraints: Separation of Powers, Rational Voting, and Constitutional Design&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 617 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/jide-o-nzelibe-and-matthew-c-stephenson-complementary-constraints-separation-of-powers-rational-voting-and-constitutional-design/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benjamin I. Sachs,  &#8220;Enabling Employee Choice: A Structural Approach to the Rules of Union Organizing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/benjamin-i-sachs-enabling-employee-choice-a-structural-approach-to-the-rules-of-union-organizing/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/benjamin-i-sachs-enabling-employee-choice-a-structural-approach-to-the-rules-of-union-organizing/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Article_6757.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benjamin I. Sachs,  "Enabling Employee Choice: A Structural Approach to the Rules of Union Organizing" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 655 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin I. Sachs,  &#8220;Enabling Employee Choice: A Structural Approach to the Rules of Union Organizing&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 655 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/benjamin-i-sachs-enabling-employee-choice-a-structural-approach-to-the-rules-of-union-organizing/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Central Bank and Intellectual Property&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/central-bank-and-intellectual-property/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/central-bank-and-intellectual-property/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Note_6767.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Central Bank and Intellectual Property" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 730 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Central Bank and Intellectual Property&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 730 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/central-bank-and-intellectual-property/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Eastern District of California Holds that Prisoner Release Is Necessary To Remedy Unconstitutional California Prison Conditions — Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P, 2009 WL 2430820 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eastern-district-of-california-holds-that-prisoner-release-is-necessary-to-remedy-unconstitutional-california-prison-conditions-%e2%80%94-coleman-v-schwarzenegger-no-civ-s-90-0520-lkk-jfm-p-200/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eastern-district-of-california-holds-that-prisoner-release-is-necessary-to-remedy-unconstitutional-california-prison-conditions-%e2%80%94-coleman-v-schwarzenegger-no-civ-s-90-0520-lkk-jfm-p-200/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6777.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Eastern District of California Holds that Prisoner Release Is Necessary To Remedy Unconstitutional California Prison Conditions — Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P, 2009 WL 2430820 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 752 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Eastern District of California Holds that Prisoner Release Is Necessary To Remedy Unconstitutional California Prison Conditions — Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P, 2009 WL 2430820 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 752 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eastern-district-of-california-holds-that-prisoner-release-is-necessary-to-remedy-unconstitutional-california-prison-conditions-%e2%80%94-coleman-v-schwarzenegger-no-civ-s-90-0520-lkk-jfm-p-200/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Seventh Circuit Holds that Involuntary Manslaughter Is Not a Crime of Violence for Sentencing Guidelines&#8217; Recidivism Enhancement. — United States v. Woods, 576 F.3d 400 (7th Cir. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-holds-that-involuntary-manslaughter-is-not-a-crime-of-violence-for-sentencing-guidelines-recidivism-enhancement-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-woods-576-f-3d-400-7th-cir-2009/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-holds-that-involuntary-manslaughter-is-not-a-crime-of-violence-for-sentencing-guidelines-recidivism-enhancement-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-woods-576-f-3d-400-7th-cir-2009/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6787.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Seventh Circuit Holds that Involuntary Manslaughter Is Not a Crime of Violence for Sentencing Guidelines' Recidivism Enhancement. — United States v. Woods, 576 F.3d 400 (7th Cir. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 760 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Seventh Circuit Holds that Involuntary Manslaughter Is Not a Crime of Violence for Sentencing Guidelines&#8217; Recidivism Enhancement. — United States v. Woods, 576 F.3d 400 (7th Cir. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 760 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/seventh-circuit-holds-that-involuntary-manslaughter-is-not-a-crime-of-violence-for-sentencing-guidelines-recidivism-enhancement-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-woods-576-f-3d-400-7th-cir-2009/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Second Circuit Looks Beyond Complaint To Find State Action Requirement Satisfied. — Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009). &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-looks-beyond-complaint-to-find-state-action-requirement-satisfied-%e2%80%94-abdullahi-v-pfizer-inc-562-f-3d-163-2d-cir-2009/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-looks-beyond-complaint-to-find-state-action-requirement-satisfied-%e2%80%94-abdullahi-v-pfizer-inc-562-f-3d-163-2d-cir-2009/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6797.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Second Circuit Looks Beyond Complaint To Find State Action Requirement Satisfied. — Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009). " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 768 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Second Circuit Looks Beyond Complaint To Find State Action Requirement Satisfied. — Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009). &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 768 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/second-circuit-looks-beyond-complaint-to-find-state-action-requirement-satisfied-%e2%80%94-abdullahi-v-pfizer-inc-562-f-3d-163-2d-cir-2009/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Third Circuit Approves Decade-Long Internet Ban for Sex Offender — United States v. Thielemann, 575 F.3d 265 (3d Cir. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-approves-decade-long-internet-ban-for-sex-offender-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-thielemann-575-f-3d-265-3d-cir-2009/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-approves-decade-long-internet-ban-for-sex-offender-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-thielemann-575-f-3d-265-3d-cir-2009/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6807.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Third Circuit Approves Decade-Long Internet Ban for Sex Offender — United States v. Thielemann, 575 F.3d 265 (3d Cir. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 776 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Third Circuit Approves Decade-Long Internet Ban for Sex Offender — United States v. Thielemann, 575 F.3d 265 (3d Cir. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 776 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/third-circuit-approves-decade-long-internet-ban-for-sex-offender-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-thielemann-575-f-3d-265-3d-cir-2009/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;First Circuit Applies Libel Law that Does Not Allow Truth as a Defense in Cases of &#8220;Actual Malice.&#8221; — Noonan v. Staples, Inc., 556 F.3d 20, reh’g denied, 561 F.3d 4 (1st Cir. 2009). &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-circuit-applies-libel-law-that-does-not-allow-truth-as-a-defense-in-cases-of-actual-malice-%e2%80%94-noonan-v-staples-inc-556-f-3d-20-reh%e2%80%99g-denied-561-f-3d-4-1st-cir-2009/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-circuit-applies-libel-law-that-does-not-allow-truth-as-a-defense-in-cases-of-actual-malice-%e2%80%94-noonan-v-staples-inc-556-f-3d-20-reh%e2%80%99g-denied-561-f-3d-4-1st-cir-2009/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6817.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "First Circuit Applies Libel Law that Does Not Allow Truth as a Defense in Cases of "Actual Malice." — Noonan v. Staples, Inc., 556 F.3d 20, reh’g denied, 561 F.3d 4 (1st Cir. 2009). " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 784 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;First Circuit Applies Libel Law that Does Not Allow Truth as a Defense in Cases of &#8220;Actual Malice.&#8221; — Noonan v. Staples, Inc., 556 F.3d 20, reh’g denied, 561 F.3d 4 (1st Cir. 2009). &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 784 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/first-circuit-applies-libel-law-that-does-not-allow-truth-as-a-defense-in-cases-of-actual-malice-%e2%80%94-noonan-v-staples-inc-556-f-3d-20-reh%e2%80%99g-denied-561-f-3d-4-1st-cir-2009/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fourth Circuit Holds that Attorney&#8217;s Fees Are Payable to Claimant and Are Eligible for Administrative Offset. — Stephens ex rel. R.E. v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 2009). &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-attorneys-fees-are-payable-to-claimant-and-are-eligible-for-administrative-offset-%e2%80%94-stephens-ex-rel-r-e-v-astrue-565-f-3d-131-4th-cir-2009/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-attorneys-fees-are-payable-to-claimant-and-are-eligible-for-administrative-offset-%e2%80%94-stephens-ex-rel-r-e-v-astrue-565-f-3d-131-4th-cir-2009/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6827.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fourth Circuit Holds that Attorney's Fees Are Payable to Claimant and Are Eligible for Administrative Offset. — Stephens ex rel. R.E. v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 2009). " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 792 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fourth Circuit Holds that Attorney&#8217;s Fees Are Payable to Claimant and Are Eligible for Administrative Offset. — Stephens ex rel. R.E. v. Astrue, 565 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 2009). &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 792 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fourth-circuit-holds-that-attorneys-fees-are-payable-to-claimant-and-are-eligible-for-administrative-offset-%e2%80%94-stephens-ex-rel-r-e-v-astrue-565-f-3d-131-4th-cir-2009/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;New York Court of Appeals Holds that State May Restrict Legal Alien Access to Disability Benefits. — Khrapunskiy v. Doar, 909 N.E.2d 70 (N.Y. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/new-york-court-of-appeals-holds-that-state-may-restrict-legal-alien-access-to-disability-benefits-%e2%80%94-khrapunskiy-v-doar-909-n-e-2d-70-n-y-2009/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/new-york-court-of-appeals-holds-that-state-may-restrict-legal-alien-access-to-disability-benefits-%e2%80%94-khrapunskiy-v-doar-909-n-e-2d-70-n-y-2009/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Case_6837.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "New York Court of Appeals Holds that State May Restrict Legal Alien Access to Disability Benefits. — Khrapunskiy v. Doar, 909 N.E.2d 70 (N.Y. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 800 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;New York Court of Appeals Holds that State May Restrict Legal Alien Access to Disability Benefits. — Khrapunskiy v. Doar, 909 N.E.2d 70 (N.Y. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 800 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/new-york-court-of-appeals-holds-that-state-may-restrict-legal-alien-access-to-disability-benefits-%e2%80%94-khrapunskiy-v-doar-909-n-e-2d-70-n-y-2009/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Recent Publications&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-3/20100121/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-3/20100121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/january10/Recent_Publications_6858.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 808 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 808 (2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications-3/20100121/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard C. Schragger,  &#8220;Mobile Capital, Local Economic Regulation, and the Democratic City&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/richard-c-schragger-mobile-capital-local-economic-regulation-and-the-democratic-city/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/richard-c-schragger-mobile-capital-local-economic-regulation-and-the-democratic-city/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Article_6657.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard C. Schragger,  "Mobile Capital, Local Economic Regulation, and the Democratic City" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 482 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard C. Schragger,  &#8220;Mobile Capital, Local Economic Regulation, and the Democratic City&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 482 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/richard-c-schragger-mobile-capital-local-economic-regulation-and-the-democratic-city/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Eleventh Circuit Holds that &#8220;Rule of Specialty&#8221; Applies Only When Provided by Treaty. — United States v. Valencia-Trujillo, 573 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eleventh-circuit-holds-that-rule-of-specialty-applies-only-when-provided-by-treaty-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-valencia-trujillo-573-f-3d-1171-11th-cir-2009/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eleventh-circuit-holds-that-rule-of-specialty-applies-only-when-provided-by-treaty-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-valencia-trujillo-573-f-3d-1171-11th-cir-2009/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Case_6687.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Eleventh Circuit Holds that "Rule of Specialty" Applies Only When Provided by Treaty. — United States v. Valencia-Trujillo, 573 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 572 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Eleventh Circuit Holds that &#8220;Rule of Specialty&#8221; Applies Only When Provided by Treaty. — United States v. Valencia-Trujillo, 573 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 572 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eleventh-circuit-holds-that-rule-of-specialty-applies-only-when-provided-by-treaty-%e2%80%94-united-states-v-valencia-trujillo-573-f-3d-1171-11th-cir-2009/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Ninth Circuit Rejects Strict Scrutiny for Pharmacy Dispensing Requirement. — Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-rejects-strict-scrutiny-for-pharmacy-dispensing-requirement-%e2%80%94-stormans-inc-v-selecky-571-f-3d-960-9th-cir-2009/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-rejects-strict-scrutiny-for-pharmacy-dispensing-requirement-%e2%80%94-stormans-inc-v-selecky-571-f-3d-960-9th-cir-2009/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Case_6717.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Ninth Circuit Rejects Strict Scrutiny for Pharmacy Dispensing Requirement. — Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 596 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Ninth Circuit Rejects Strict Scrutiny for Pharmacy Dispensing Requirement. — Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 571 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 596 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/ninth-circuit-rejects-strict-scrutiny-for-pharmacy-dispensing-requirement-%e2%80%94-stormans-inc-v-selecky-571-f-3d-960-9th-cir-2009/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Einer Elhauge,  &#8220;Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/einer-elhauge-tying-bundled-discounts-and-the-death-of-the-single-monopoly-profit-theory/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/einer-elhauge-tying-bundled-discounts-and-the-death-of-the-single-monopoly-profit-theory/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Article_6647.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Einer Elhauge,  "Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 397 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einer Elhauge,  &#8220;Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 397 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/einer-elhauge-tying-bundled-discounts-and-the-death-of-the-single-monopoly-profit-theory/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;D.C. Circuit Quashes Subpoenas for Congressman&#8217;s Testimony to the House Ethics Committee. — In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 571 F.3d 1200 (D.C. Cir. 2009).  &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-quashes-subpoenas-for-congressmans-testimony-to-the-house-ethics-committee-%e2%80%94-in-re-grand-jury-subpoenas-571-f-3d-1200-d-c-cir-2009/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-quashes-subpoenas-for-congressmans-testimony-to-the-house-ethics-committee-%e2%80%94-in-re-grand-jury-subpoenas-571-f-3d-1200-d-c-cir-2009/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Case_6677.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Quashes Subpoenas for Congressman's Testimony to the House Ethics Committee. — In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 571 F.3d 1200 (D.C. Cir. 2009).  " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 564 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Quashes Subpoenas for Congressman&#8217;s Testimony to the House Ethics Committee. — In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 571 F.3d 1200 (D.C. Cir. 2009).  &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 564 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-quashes-subpoenas-for-congressmans-testimony-to-the-house-ethics-committee-%e2%80%94-in-re-grand-jury-subpoenas-571-f-3d-1200-d-c-cir-2009/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Textualism as Fair Notice&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/textualism-as-fair-notice/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/textualism-as-fair-notice/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Note_6667.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Textualism as Fair Notice" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 542 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Textualism as Fair Notice&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 542 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/textualism-as-fair-notice/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;D.C. Circuit Holds that Police Checkpoint Program Likely Violates the Fourth Amendment.  — Mills v. District of Columbia, 571 F.3d 1304 (D.C. Cir. 2009).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-that-police-checkpoint-program-likely-violates-the-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-mills-v-district-of-columbia-571-f-3d-1304-d-c-cir-2009/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-that-police-checkpoint-program-likely-violates-the-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-mills-v-district-of-columbia-571-f-3d-1304-d-c-cir-2009/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Case_6707.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Holds that Police Checkpoint Program Likely Violates the Fourth Amendment.  — Mills v. District of Columbia, 571 F.3d 1304 (D.C. Cir. 2009)." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 588 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Holds that Police Checkpoint Program Likely Violates the Fourth Amendment.  — Mills v. District of Columbia, 571 F.3d 1304 (D.C. Cir. 2009).&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 588 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-that-police-checkpoint-program-likely-violates-the-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-mills-v-district-of-columbia-571-f-3d-1304-d-c-cir-2009/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Alien Tort Statute Claims Against Coca-Cola Under Iqbal&#8217;s Plausibility Pleading Standard. — Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co., No. 06-15851, 2009 WL 2431463 (11th Cir. Aug. 11, 2009).  &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eleventh-circuit-dismisses-alien-tort-statute-claims-against-coca-cola-under-iqbals-plausibility-pleading-standard-%e2%80%94-sinaltrainal-v-coca-cola-co-no-06-15851-2009-wl-2431463-11th-ci/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eleventh-circuit-dismisses-alien-tort-statute-claims-against-coca-cola-under-iqbals-plausibility-pleading-standard-%e2%80%94-sinaltrainal-v-coca-cola-co-no-06-15851-2009-wl-2431463-11th-ci/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Case_6697.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Alien Tort Statute Claims Against Coca-Cola Under Iqbal's Plausibility Pleading Standard. — Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co., No. 06-15851, 2009 WL 2431463 (11th Cir. Aug. 11, 2009).  " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 580 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Eleventh Circuit Dismisses Alien Tort Statute Claims Against Coca-Cola Under Iqbal&#8217;s Plausibility Pleading Standard. — Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co., No. 06-15851, 2009 WL 2431463 (11th Cir. Aug. 11, 2009).  &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 580 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/eleventh-circuit-dismisses-alien-tort-statute-claims-against-coca-cola-under-iqbals-plausibility-pleading-standard-%e2%80%94-sinaltrainal-v-coca-cola-co-no-06-15851-2009-wl-2431463-11th-ci/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Recent Publications&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Publications_6737.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Recent Publications" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 612 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Recent Publications&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 612 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/recent-publications/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Department of Labor Regulations Alter Substitution of Paid Leave Provision Under the FMLA. — FMLA Final Rule, 73 Fed. Reg. 67,934 (Nov. 17, 2008) (codified at 29 C.F.R. pt. 825 (2009)).  &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/department-of-labor-regulations-alter-substitution-of-paid-leave-provision-under-the-fmla-%e2%80%94-fmla-final-rule-73-fed-reg-67934-nov-17-2008-codified-at-29-c-f-r-pt-825-2009/20091218/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/department-of-labor-regulations-alter-substitution-of-paid-leave-provision-under-the-fmla-%e2%80%94-fmla-final-rule-73-fed-reg-67934-nov-17-2008-codified-at-29-c-f-r-pt-825-2009/20091218/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/december09/Recent_Regulation_6727.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Department of Labor Regulations Alter Substitution of Paid Leave Provision Under the FMLA. — FMLA Final Rule, 73 Fed. Reg. 67,934 (Nov. 17, 2008) (codified at 29 C.F.R. pt. 825 (2009)).  " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 604 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Department of Labor Regulations Alter Substitution of Paid Leave Provision Under the FMLA. — FMLA Final Rule, 73 Fed. Reg. 67,934 (Nov. 17, 2008) (codified at 29 C.F.R. pt. 825 (2009)).  &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 604 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/department-of-labor-regulations-alter-substitution-of-paid-leave-provision-under-the-fmla-%e2%80%94-fmla-final-rule-73-fed-reg-67934-nov-17-2008-codified-at-29-c-f-r-pt-825-2009/20091218/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adrian Vermeule,  &#8220;System Effects and the Constitution&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/adrian-vermeule-system-effects-and-the-constitution/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/adrian-vermeule-system-effects-and-the-constitution/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Foreword_6327.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Vermeule,  "System Effects and the Constitution" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 4 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Vermeule,  &#8220;System Effects and the Constitution&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/adrian-vermeule-system-effects-and-the-constitution/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Due Process — Peremptory Challenges — Harmless Error Doctrine: Rivera v. Illinois.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/due-process-%e2%80%94-peremptory-challenges-%e2%80%94-harmless-error-doctrine-rivera-v-illinois/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/due-process-%e2%80%94-peremptory-challenges-%e2%80%94-harmless-error-doctrine-rivera-v-illinois/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6437.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Due Process — Peremptory Challenges — Harmless Error Doctrine: Rivera v. Illinois." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 212 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Due Process — Peremptory Challenges — Harmless Error Doctrine: Rivera v. Illinois.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 212 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/due-process-%e2%80%94-peremptory-challenges-%e2%80%94-harmless-error-doctrine-rivera-v-illinois/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Witness Confrontation — Testimony of Crime Lab Experts: Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-witness-confrontation-%e2%80%94-testimony-of-crime-lab-experts-melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-witness-confrontation-%e2%80%94-testimony-of-crime-lab-experts-melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6427.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Criminal Law and Procedure — Witness Confrontation — Testimony of Crime Lab Experts: Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 202 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Witness Confrontation — Testimony of Crime Lab Experts: Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 202 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-witness-confrontation-%e2%80%94-testimony-of-crime-lab-experts-melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Exclusionary Rule: Herring v. United States. &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-exclusionary-rule-herring-v-united-states/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-exclusionary-rule-herring-v-united-states/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6377.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Exclusionary Rule: Herring v. United States. " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 153 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Exclusionary Rule: Herring v. United States. &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 153 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-exclusionary-rule-herring-v-united-states/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penny J. White,  &#8220;Relinquished Responsibilities&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/penny-j-white-relinquished-responsibilities/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/penny-j-white-relinquished-responsibilities/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Comment_6367.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penny J. White,  "Relinquished Responsibilities" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 120 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penny J. White,  &#8220;Relinquished Responsibilities&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 120 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/penny-j-white-relinquished-responsibilities/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Review of Administrative Action — Communications Act — Scope of Arbitrary and Capricious Review: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/review-of-administrative-action-%e2%80%94-communications-act-%e2%80%94-scope-of-arbitrary-and-capricious-review-fcc-v-fox-television-stations-inc/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/review-of-administrative-action-%e2%80%94-communications-act-%e2%80%94-scope-of-arbitrary-and-capricious-review-fcc-v-fox-television-stations-inc/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6577.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Review of Administrative Action — Communications Act — Scope of Arbitrary and Capricious Review: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 352 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Review of Administrative Action — Communications Act — Scope of Arbitrary and Capricious Review: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 352 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/review-of-administrative-action-%e2%80%94-communications-act-%e2%80%94-scope-of-arbitrary-and-capricious-review-fcc-v-fox-television-stations-inc/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Review of Administrative Action — Clean Water Act — Judicial Review of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/review-of-administrative-action-%e2%80%94-clean-water-act-%e2%80%94-judicial-review-of-cost-benefit-analysis-entergy-corp-v-riverkeeper-inc/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/review-of-administrative-action-%e2%80%94-clean-water-act-%e2%80%94-judicial-review-of-cost-benefit-analysis-entergy-corp-v-riverkeeper-inc/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6567.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Review of Administrative Action — Clean Water Act — Judicial Review of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 342 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Review of Administrative Action — Clean Water Act — Judicial Review of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 342 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/review-of-administrative-action-%e2%80%94-clean-water-act-%e2%80%94-judicial-review-of-cost-benefit-analysis-entergy-corp-v-riverkeeper-inc/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act — Iraqi Sovereign Immunity: Republic of Iraq v. Beaty.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/foreign-sovereign-immunities-act-%e2%80%94-iraqi-sovereign-immunity-republic-of-iraq-v-beaty/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/foreign-sovereign-immunities-act-%e2%80%94-iraqi-sovereign-immunity-republic-of-iraq-v-beaty/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6517.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act — Iraqi Sovereign Immunity: Republic of Iraq v. Beaty." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 292 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act — Iraqi Sovereign Immunity: Republic of Iraq v. Beaty.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 292 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/foreign-sovereign-immunities-act-%e2%80%94-iraqi-sovereign-immunity-republic-of-iraq-v-beaty/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Civil Rights Act, Title VII — Compliance Efforts: Ricci v. DeStefano.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/civil-rights-act-title-vii-%e2%80%94-compliance-efforts-ricci-v-destefano/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/civil-rights-act-title-vii-%e2%80%94-compliance-efforts-ricci-v-destefano/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6507.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Civil Rights Act, Title VII — Compliance Efforts: Ricci v. DeStefano." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 282 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Civil Rights Act, Title VII — Compliance Efforts: Ricci v. DeStefano.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 282 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/civil-rights-act-title-vii-%e2%80%94-compliance-efforts-ricci-v-destefano/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Freedom of Speech and Expression — Government Speech: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-speech-and-expression-%e2%80%94-government-speech-pleasant-grove-city-v-summum/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-speech-and-expression-%e2%80%94-government-speech-pleasant-grove-city-v-summum/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6457.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Freedom of Speech and Expression — Government Speech: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 232 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Freedom of Speech and Expression — Government Speech: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 232 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-speech-and-expression-%e2%80%94-government-speech-pleasant-grove-city-v-summum/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamela S. Karlan,  &#8220;Electing Judges, Judging Elections, and the Lessons of Caperton&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/pamela-s-karlan-electing-judges-judging-elections-and-the-lessons-of-caperton/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/pamela-s-karlan-electing-judges-judging-elections-and-the-lessons-of-caperton/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Comment_6347.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pamela S. Karlan,  "Electing Judges, Judging Elections, and the Lessons of Caperton" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 80 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela S. Karlan,  &#8220;Electing Judges, Judging Elections, and the Lessons of Caperton&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 80 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/pamela-s-karlan-electing-judges-judging-elections-and-the-lessons-of-caperton/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: Due Process Limitations on the Appearance of Judicial Bias&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/caperton-v-a-t-massey-coal-co-due-process-limitations-on-the-appearance-of-judicial-bias/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/caperton-v-a-t-massey-coal-co-due-process-limitations-on-the-appearance-of-judicial-bias/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Comment_6337.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: Due Process Limitations on the Appearance of Judicial Bias" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 73 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: Due Process Limitations on the Appearance of Judicial Bias&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 73 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/caperton-v-a-t-massey-coal-co-due-process-limitations-on-the-appearance-of-judicial-bias/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Sixth Amendment — Sentencing — Factfinding in Sentencing for Multiple Offenses: Oregon v. Ice.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-sixth-amendment-%e2%80%94-sentencing-%e2%80%94-factfinding-in-sentencing-for-multiple-offenses-oregon-v-ice/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-sixth-amendment-%e2%80%94-sentencing-%e2%80%94-factfinding-in-sentencing-for-multiple-offenses-oregon-v-ice/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6417.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Criminal Law and Procedure — Sixth Amendment — Sentencing — Factfinding in Sentencing for Multiple Offenses: Oregon v. Ice." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 192 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Sixth Amendment — Sentencing — Factfinding in Sentencing for Multiple Offenses: Oregon v. Ice.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 192 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-sixth-amendment-%e2%80%94-sentencing-%e2%80%94-factfinding-in-sentencing-for-multiple-offenses-oregon-v-ice/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Due Process — Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: District Attorney&#8217;s Office v. Osborne.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/due-process-%e2%80%94-postconviction-access-to-dna-evidence-district-attorneys-office-v-osborne/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/due-process-%e2%80%94-postconviction-access-to-dna-evidence-district-attorneys-office-v-osborne/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6447.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Due Process — Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: District Attorney's Office v. Osborne." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 222 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Due Process — Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: District Attorney&#8217;s Office v. Osborne.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 222 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/due-process-%e2%80%94-postconviction-access-to-dna-evidence-district-attorneys-office-v-osborne/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Sixth Amendment — Right to Counsel — Interrogation Without Counsel Present: Montejo v. Louisiana.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-sixth-amendment-%e2%80%94-right-to-counsel-%e2%80%94-interrogation-without-counsel-present-montejo-v-louisiana/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-sixth-amendment-%e2%80%94-right-to-counsel-%e2%80%94-interrogation-without-counsel-present-montejo-v-louisiana/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6407.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Criminal Law and Procedure — Sixth Amendment — Right to Counsel — Interrogation Without Counsel Present: Montejo v. Louisiana." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 182 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Sixth Amendment — Right to Counsel — Interrogation Without Counsel Present: Montejo v. Louisiana.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 182 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-sixth-amendment-%e2%80%94-right-to-counsel-%e2%80%94-interrogation-without-counsel-present-montejo-v-louisiana/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Search Incident to Arrest: Arizona v. Gant.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-search-incident-to-arrest-arizona-v-gant/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-search-incident-to-arrest-arizona-v-gant/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6397.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Search Incident to Arrest: Arizona v. Gant." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 172 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Search Incident to Arrest: Arizona v. Gant.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 172 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-search-incident-to-arrest-arizona-v-gant/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawrence Lessig,  &#8220;What Everybody Knows and What Too Few Accept&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/lawrence-lessig-what-everybody-knows-and-what-too-few-accept/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/lawrence-lessig-what-everybody-knows-and-what-too-few-accept/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Comment_6357.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawrence Lessig,  "What Everybody Knows and What Too Few Accept" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 104 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence Lessig,  &#8220;What Everybody Knows and What Too Few Accept&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 104 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/lawrence-lessig-what-everybody-knows-and-what-too-few-accept/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Search by School Officials: Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding. &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-search-by-school-officials-safford-unified-school-district-no-1-v-redding/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-search-by-school-officials-safford-unified-school-district-no-1-v-redding/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6387.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Search by School Officials: Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding. " 123 Harv. L. Rev. 163 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Criminal Law and Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Search by School Officials: Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding. &#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 163 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/criminal-law-and-procedure-%e2%80%94-fourth-amendment-%e2%80%94-search-by-school-officials-safford-unified-school-district-no-1-v-redding/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Statistics&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-statistics/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-statistics/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Statistics_6637.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "The Statistics" 123 Harv. L. Rev. 382 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;The Statistics&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 382 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-statistics/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Voting Rights Act — Vote Dilution: Bartlett v. Strickland.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/voting-rights-act-%e2%80%94-vote-dilution-bartlett-v-strickland/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/voting-rights-act-%e2%80%94-vote-dilution-bartlett-v-strickland/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6597.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Voting Rights Act — Vote Dilution: Bartlett v. Strickland." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 372 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Voting Rights Act — Vote Dilution: Bartlett v. Strickland.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 372 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/voting-rights-act-%e2%80%94-vote-dilution-bartlett-v-strickland/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;National Labor Relations Act — Waiver of Right to a Federal Forum: 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/national-labor-relations-act-%e2%80%94-waiver-of-right-to-a-federal-forum-14-penn-plaza-llc-v-pyett/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/national-labor-relations-act-%e2%80%94-waiver-of-right-to-a-federal-forum-14-penn-plaza-llc-v-pyett/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6557.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "National Labor Relations Act — Waiver of Right to a Federal Forum: 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 332 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;National Labor Relations Act — Waiver of Right to a Federal Forum: 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 332 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/national-labor-relations-act-%e2%80%94-waiver-of-right-to-a-federal-forum-14-penn-plaza-llc-v-pyett/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Voting Rights Act — Preclearance: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. One v. Holder.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/voting-rights-act-%e2%80%94-preclearance-northwest-austin-municipal-utility-district-no-one-v-holder/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/voting-rights-act-%e2%80%94-preclearance-northwest-austin-municipal-utility-district-no-one-v-holder/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6587.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Voting Rights Act — Preclearance: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. One v. Holder." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 362 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Voting Rights Act — Preclearance: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. One v. Holder.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 362 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/voting-rights-act-%e2%80%94-preclearance-northwest-austin-municipal-utility-district-no-one-v-holder/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;National Banking Act — Preemption of State Law Enforcement: Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass&#8217;n.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/national-banking-act-%e2%80%94-preemption-of-state-law-enforcement-cuomo-v-clearing-house-assn/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/national-banking-act-%e2%80%94-preemption-of-state-law-enforcement-cuomo-v-clearing-house-assn/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6547.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "National Banking Act — Preemption of State Law Enforcement: Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass'n." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 322 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;National Banking Act — Preemption of State Law Enforcement: Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass&#8217;n.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 322 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/national-banking-act-%e2%80%94-preemption-of-state-law-enforcement-cuomo-v-clearing-house-assn/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Identity Theft — Mens Rea Requirement: Flores-Figueroa v. United States.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/identity-theft-%e2%80%94-mens-rea-requirement-flores-figueroa-v-united-states/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/identity-theft-%e2%80%94-mens-rea-requirement-flores-figueroa-v-united-states/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6537.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Identity Theft — Mens Rea Requirement: Flores-Figueroa v. United States." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 312 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Identity Theft — Mens Rea Requirement: Flores-Figueroa v. United States.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 312 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/identity-theft-%e2%80%94-mens-rea-requirement-flores-figueroa-v-united-states/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Qualified Immunity — Order of Analysis: Pearson v. Callahan.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/qualified-immunity-%e2%80%94-order-of-analysis-pearson-v-callahan/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/qualified-immunity-%e2%80%94-order-of-analysis-pearson-v-callahan/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6497.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Qualified Immunity — Order of Analysis: Pearson v. Callahan." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 272 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Qualified Immunity — Order of Analysis: Pearson v. Callahan.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 272 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/qualified-immunity-%e2%80%94-order-of-analysis-pearson-v-callahan/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hawaii Apology Resolution — Alienation of Hawaiian Land: Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/hawaii-apology-resolution-%e2%80%94-alienation-of-hawaiian-land-hawaii-v-office-of-hawaiian-affairs/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/hawaii-apology-resolution-%e2%80%94-alienation-of-hawaiian-land-hawaii-v-office-of-hawaiian-affairs/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6527.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Hawaii Apology Resolution — Alienation of Hawaiian Land: Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 302 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Hawaii Apology Resolution — Alienation of Hawaiian Land: Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 302 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/hawaii-apology-resolution-%e2%80%94-alienation-of-hawaiian-land-hawaii-v-office-of-hawaiian-affairs/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Federal Preemption of State Law — Preemption of State Common Law Claims: Wyeth v. Levine.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-preemption-of-state-law-%e2%80%94-preemption-of-state-common-law-claims-wyeth-v-levine/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-preemption-of-state-law-%e2%80%94-preemption-of-state-common-law-claims-wyeth-v-levine/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6487.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Federal Preemption of State Law — Preemption of State Common Law Claims: Wyeth v. Levine." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 262 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Federal Preemption of State Law — Preemption of State Common Law Claims: Wyeth v. Levine.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 262 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/federal-preemption-of-state-law-%e2%80%94-preemption-of-state-common-law-claims-wyeth-v-levine/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Civil Procedure — Pleading Standards: Ashcroft v. Iqbal.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/civil-procedure-%e2%80%94-pleading-standards-ashcroft-v-iqbal/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/civil-procedure-%e2%80%94-pleading-standards-ashcroft-v-iqbal/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6477.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Civil Procedure — Pleading Standards: Ashcroft v. Iqbal." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 252 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Civil Procedure — Pleading Standards: Ashcroft v. Iqbal.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 252 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/civil-procedure-%e2%80%94-pleading-standards-ashcroft-v-iqbal/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Freedom of Speech and Expression — Government Subsidies of Political Speech: Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass&#8217;n.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-speech-and-expression-%e2%80%94-government-subsidies-of-political-speech-ysursa-v-pocatello-education-assn/20091030/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-speech-and-expression-%e2%80%94-government-subsidies-of-political-speech-ysursa-v-pocatello-education-assn/20091030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/123/november09/Leading_Case_6467.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Freedom of Speech and Expression — Government Subsidies of Political Speech: Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass'n." 123 Harv. L. Rev. 242 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Freedom of Speech and Expression — Government Subsidies of Political Speech: Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass&#8217;n.&#8221; 123 Harv. L. Rev. 242 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/freedom-of-speech-and-expression-%e2%80%94-government-subsidies-of-political-speech-ysursa-v-pocatello-education-assn/20091030/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;D.C. Circuit Upholds Access Restrictions to Military-Run Newspapers on Forum Analysis Grounds. — Bryant v. Gates, 532 F.3d 888&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-upholds-access-restrictions-to-military-run-newspapers-on-forum-analysis-grounds-%e2%80%94-bryant-v-gates-532-f-3d-888/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-upholds-access-restrictions-to-military-run-newspapers-on-forum-analysis-grounds-%e2%80%94-bryant-v-gates-532-f-3d-888/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Recent_Case_6627.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Upholds Access Restrictions to Military-Run Newspapers on Forum Analysis Grounds. — Bryant v. Gates, 532 F.3d 888" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2250 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Upholds Access Restrictions to Military-Run Newspapers on Forum Analysis Grounds. — Bryant v. Gates, 532 F.3d 888&#8243; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2250 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-upholds-access-restrictions-to-military-run-newspapers-on-forum-analysis-grounds-%e2%80%94-bryant-v-gates-532-f-3d-888/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Media Incentives and National Security Secrets&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/media-incentives-and-national-security-secrets/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/media-incentives-and-national-security-secrets/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Note_3727.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Media Incentives and National Security Secrets" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2228 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Media Incentives and National Security Secrets&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2228 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/media-incentives-and-national-security-secrets/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Garrett,  &#8220;Preferences, Laws, and Default Rules&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/elizabeth-garrett-preferences-laws-and-default-rules/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/elizabeth-garrett-preferences-laws-and-default-rules/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Book_Review_717.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Garrett,  "Preferences, Laws, and Default Rules" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2104 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Garrett,  &#8220;Preferences, Laws, and Default Rules&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2104 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/elizabeth-garrett-preferences-laws-and-default-rules/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Skowronek,  &#8220;The Conservative Insurgency and Presidential Power: A Developmental Perspective on the Unitary Executive&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-skowronek-the-conservative-insurgency-and-presidential-power-a-developmental-perspective-on-the-unitary-executive/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-skowronek-the-conservative-insurgency-and-presidential-power-a-developmental-perspective-on-the-unitary-executive/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Essay_707.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Skowronek,  "The Conservative Insurgency and Presidential Power: A Developmental Perspective on the Unitary Executive" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2070 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Skowronek,  &#8220;The Conservative Insurgency and Presidential Power: A Developmental Perspective on the Unitary Executive&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2070 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/stephen-skowronek-the-conservative-insurgency-and-presidential-power-a-developmental-perspective-on-the-unitary-executive/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;D.C. Circuit Holds that the SEC Chairman Is Not the &#8220;Head&#8221; of the SEC. — Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008), cert. granted, 77 U.S.L.W. 3431 (U.S. May 18, 2009) (No. 08-861). &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-that-the-sec-chairman-is-not-the-head-of-the-sec-%e2%80%94-free-enterprise-fund-v-public-co-accounting-oversight-board-537-f-3d-667-d-c-cir-2008-cert-granted-77-u/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-that-the-sec-chairman-is-not-the-head-of-the-sec-%e2%80%94-free-enterprise-fund-v-public-co-accounting-oversight-board-537-f-3d-667-d-c-cir-2008-cert-granted-77-u/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Recent_Case_3757.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "D.C. Circuit Holds that the SEC Chairman Is Not the "Head" of the SEC. — Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008), cert. granted, 77 U.S.L.W. 3431 (U.S. May 18, 2009) (No. 08-861). " 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2267 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;D.C. Circuit Holds that the SEC Chairman Is Not the &#8220;Head&#8221; of the SEC. — Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008), cert. granted, 77 U.S.L.W. 3431 (U.S. May 18, 2009) (No. 08-861). &#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2267 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/d-c-circuit-holds-that-the-sec-chairman-is-not-the-head-of-the-sec-%e2%80%94-free-enterprise-fund-v-public-co-accounting-oversight-board-537-f-3d-667-d-c-cir-2008-cert-granted-77-u/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Child Pornography, the Internet, and the Challenge of Updating Statutory Terms&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/child-pornography-the-internet-and-the-challenge-of-updating-statutory-terms/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/child-pornography-the-internet-and-the-challenge-of-updating-statutory-terms/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Note_3697.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Child Pornography, the Internet, and the Challenge of Updating Statutory Terms" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2206 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Child Pornography, the Internet, and the Challenge of Updating Statutory Terms&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2206 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/child-pornography-the-internet-and-the-challenge-of-updating-statutory-terms/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fifth Circuit Applies Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance to Uphold Attorney Speech Restrictions in Bankruptcy Code. — Hersh v. United States ex rel. Mukasey, 553 F. 3d 743 (5th Cir. 2008).&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-applies-doctrine-of-constitutional-avoidance-to-uphold-attorney-speech-restrictions-in-bankruptcy-code-%e2%80%94-hersh-v-united-states-ex-rel-mukasey-553-f-3d-743-5th-cir-2008/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-applies-doctrine-of-constitutional-avoidance-to-uphold-attorney-speech-restrictions-in-bankruptcy-code-%e2%80%94-hersh-v-united-states-ex-rel-mukasey-553-f-3d-743-5th-cir-2008/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Recent_Case_3747.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Fifth Circuit Applies Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance to Uphold Attorney Speech Restrictions in Bankruptcy Code. — Hersh v. United States ex rel. Mukasey, 553 F. 3d 743 (5th Cir. 2008)." 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2258 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Fifth Circuit Applies Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance to Uphold Attorney Speech Restrictions in Bankruptcy Code. — Hersh v. United States ex rel. Mukasey, 553 F. 3d 743 (5th Cir. 2008).&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2258 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/fifth-circuit-applies-doctrine-of-constitutional-avoidance-to-uphold-attorney-speech-restrictions-in-bankruptcy-code-%e2%80%94-hersh-v-united-states-ex-rel-mukasey-553-f-3d-743-5th-cir-2008/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;On Enforcing Viral Terms&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/on-enforcing-viral-terms/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/on-enforcing-viral-terms/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Note_3657.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "On Enforcing Viral Terms" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2184 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;On Enforcing Viral Terms&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2184 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/on-enforcing-viral-terms/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Mysteries of the Congressional Review Act&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-mysteries-of-the-congressional-review-act/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-mysteries-of-the-congressional-review-act/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Note_737.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "The Mysteries of the Congressional Review Act" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2162 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;The Mysteries of the Congressional Review Act&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2162 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/the-mysteries-of-the-congressional-review-act/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John F. Manning,  &#8220;Federalism and the Generality Problem in Constitutional Interpretation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/john-f-manning-federalism-and-the-generality-problem-in-constitutional-interpretation/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/john-f-manning-federalism-and-the-generality-problem-in-constitutional-interpretation/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Article_697.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John F. Manning,  "Federalism and the Generality Problem in Constitutional Interpretation" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2003 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John F. Manning,  &#8220;Federalism and the Generality Problem in Constitutional Interpretation&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2003 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/john-f-manning-federalism-and-the-generality-problem-in-constitutional-interpretation/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/strict-scrutiny-in-the-middle-forum/20090601/</link>
		<comments>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/strict-scrutiny-in-the-middle-forum/20090601/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/june09/Note_727.php]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ "Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum" 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2140 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum&#8221; 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2140 (2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://law.journalfeeds.com/collegiate-reviews/harvard-law-review/strict-scrutiny-in-the-middle-forum/20090601/feed/ YXZ</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.864 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-18 22:36:38 -->
