Volume 93, Issue 3

Patently Obvious: Why The District Court’s Ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. USPTO is Incomplete -Kristin WallNonobviousness Standards for Hardware and Software Before and After KSR: What is the Difference? -Michelle Friedman Murray The [...]

Volume 93, Issue 2

Patent Law Harmonization in the Age of Globalization: The Necessity and Strategy for a Pragmatic Outcome -Dongwook ChunLicensing As a Means of Providing Affordability and Accessibility in Digital Markets: Alternatives to a Digital First Sale Doctrine [...]



Volume 93, Number 1

Does a Utility that is “Unproved” at the Time of Filing Violate §112? Irving N. FeitCan You Patent Genes? Yes and No Eric J. RogersOvercoming Babel’s Curse: Adapting the Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents Jonathan SkinnerCritique of Recent [...]

Volume 92, Number 4, Fall 2010

The EPC Exceptions to Patentable Subject Matter in the United Kingdom – Emir Aly Crowne-Mohammed, BA, LLB, LLM, LLM, PhD (cand.)How a Comparative Analysis of Federal Circuit Standards of ReviewSupports Limiting the Role of Juries in Determinations [...]

Volume 92, Number 3, Summer 2010

Determination of Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art: A Post-KSR Prosecution Tool – Matthew J. SparkPatent Prosecution Pitfalls: Perspectives From The Trenches Of Litigation – Benjamin Hattenbach, Andrei Iancu, Kenneth Weatherwax You Infringed My [...]



Volume 92, Number 2, Spring 2010

Fellow Citizens: Be On Guard – Paul R. MichelMachine-or-Transformation Test Hits The Board: Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Following Bilski – Peter Ludwig The Book of Wisdom: How to Bring a Metaphorical Flourish Into the Realm of Economic Reality [...]

Volume 92, Number 1, Winter 2010

A Critique of Recent Opinions in Patent Interferences – Charles L. GholzObviousness in Patents Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc. – Tom BrodyA Correlation Between the State of the US Economy and [...]

Volume 91, Nos. 10, 11, 12 (Oct./Nov./Dec. 2009)

The Supreme Court, Bilski, and Sensible Limits on Patents, John W. SchlicherBeware the Inequitable Conduct Charge! (Why Practitioners Submit What They Submit) , Lisa A. DolakWinter v. NRDC: A Stricter Standard for Irreparable Harm in [...]

Volume 91, Nos. 7, 8, 9 (July/Aug/Sept 2009)

Joint infringement and Internet Software Patents: An Uncertain Future?, Dolly Wu The Real Problem with Patent Infringement Damages, Martha K. Gooding & William C. RooklidgeHow the Federal Circuit Clarified the “Muddy Concept” of Joint [...]

Volume 90, No. 5, May 2008

Brand v. Miller Prevents Administrative Patent Judges From Using Their Common Sense in Inter Partes Proceedings – Robert C. Nissen and Charles L. Gholz A Function for Markman Claim Construction in Design Patents – Craig Zieminski Patent Reform: The [...]