Law JournalFeeds

Volume 92 Number 2, Spring 2010Fellow Citizens: Be On Guard – Paul R. MichelMachine-or-Transformation Test Hits The Board: Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Following Bilski – Peter Ludwig The Book of Wisdom: How to Bring a Metaphorical Flourish Into the Realm of Economic Reality by Adopting a Market Reconstruction Requirement in the Calculation of a Reasonable Royalty – D. Christopher HollyPatent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) – Juan LapenneDeconstructing the Patent Application Backlog …A Story of Prolonged Pendency, PCT Pandemonium & Patent Pending Pirates – Warren K. Mabey, Jr.Hey! You! Get Off of My Cloud: Defining and Protecting the Metes and Bounds of Privacy, Security, and Property in Cloud Computing – Timothy D. Martin [...]

Volume 92 Number 1, Winter 2010A Critique of Recent Opinions in Patent Interferences – Charles L. GholzObviousness in Patents Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc. – Tom BrodyA Correlation Between the State of the US Economy and Patent Litigation Activity – Bradley D. Riel and Paul T. MeiklejohnReconsidering Reasonable Royalty Damages Methodology in Patent Infringement Suits: Supplementing Georgia Pacific  with the Reasonable Royalty Determination Board – Erick S. LeeSoftware Related Inventions at the Enlarged Board of Appeals – Fabian Edlund
Volume 92 Number 1, Winter 2010A Critique of Recent Opinions in Patent Interferences – Charles L. GholzObviousness in Patents Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc. – Tom BrodyA Correlation Between the State of the US Economy and Patent Litigation Activity – Bradley D. Riel and Paul T. MeiklejohnReconsidering Reasonable Royalty Damages Methodology in Patent Infringement Suits: Supplementing Georgia Pacific  with the Reasonable Royalty Determination Board – Erick S. LeeSoftware Related Inventions at the Enlarged Board of Appeals – Fabian [...]

The Supreme Court, Bilski, and Sensible Limits on Patents, John W. SchlicherBeware the Inequitable Conduct Charge! (Why Practitioners Submit What They Submit) , Lisa A. DolakWinter v. NRDC: A Stricter Standard for Irreparable Harm in Trademark Cases?, Thomas M. WilliamsDesign Patent Protection for Animated Computer-Generated Icons , David LeasonAn American View of the Patent System in Europe in 2009, John B. PegramAnnual Index (2009)
The Supreme Court, Bilski, and Sensible Limits on Patents, John W. SchlicherBeware the Inequitable Conduct Charge! (Why Practitioners Submit What They Submit) , Lisa A. DolakWinter v. NRDC: A Stricter Standard for Irreparable Harm in Trademark Cases?, Thomas M. WilliamsDesign Patent Protection for Animated Computer-Generated Icons , David LeasonAn American View of the Patent System in Europe in 2009, John B. PegramAnnual Index [...]

Joint infringement and Internet Software Patents: An Uncertain Future?, Dolly Wu The Real Problem with Patent Infringement Damages, Martha K. Gooding & William C. RooklidgeHow the Federal Circuit Clarified the “Muddy Concept” of Joint Inventorship, George M. SirillaPitfalls Associated with Post-Patent Issuance Supplementation or Replacement of a Biological Culture Deposit – 37 CFR § 1.805, Tracy U. Palovich & Robert J. Duminiak
Joint infringement and Internet Software Patents: An Uncertain Future?, Dolly Wu The Real Problem with Patent Infringement Damages, Martha K. Gooding & William C. RooklidgeHow the Federal Circuit Clarified the “Muddy Concept” of Joint Inventorship, George M. SirillaPitfalls Associated with Post-Patent Issuance Supplementation or Replacement of a Biological Culture Deposit – 37 CFR § 1.805, Tracy U. Palovich & Robert J. Duminiak [...]

Brand v. Miller Prevents Administrative Patent Judges From Using Their Common Sense in Inter Partes Proceedings – Robert C. Nissen and Charles L. Gholz A Function for Markman Claim Construction in Design Patents – Craig Zieminski Patent Reform: The Pharmaceutical Industry Prescription For Post-Grant Opposition And Remedies – Eric E. Williams Response to "Patent Pendency Problems and Possible Solutions to Reduciing Patent Pendency at the United States Patent and Trademark Office" – Colin LaRose Reasonable Apprehension Of An Infringement Suit Is Not Required: Wonderful News For A Prospective Licensee – Elkia R. Manglona
  [...]

Freedom to Experiment: Toward a Concept of Inventor Welfare – Rudolph J.R. Peritz Independent Invention As A Defense To Patent Infringement – Samson Vermont An Independent Invention Defense to Patent Infringement: The Academy Talking to Itself: Should Anyone Listen? – Roger Milgrim Less "Gotcha": A Response to Milgrim – Samson Vermont A Reply to A Response – Roger [...]

How to Get Patent Protection in Europe? – Marco T. Connor and Lin YasongThe Patent Office Meets the Poison Pill: Why Legal Methods Cannot Be Patented – Andrew A. SchwartsWell-known Marks Doctrine: Where Do We Go From Here? – Tashia A. Bunch
  [...]

Code on Disks and Hat Tricks – Is Computer Software on a Medium Really Patentable? – Andrei Iancu and Jeremiah HelmThe Continuing Controversy Over Business Methods Patents – Lois MatelanIn re Comiskey and E-Commerce Patentability – Sam [...]

A Critique of Recent Opinions in Patent Interferences – Charles L. GholzSecond Life – A New Dimension For Trademark Infringement – Max VernPatent Pendency Problems and Possible Solutions to Reducing Patent Pendency at the United States Patent and Trademark [...]

Court Opinions Affecting PTO Trademark Practice: The Year in Review – Jeffrey M. Samuels and Linda B. Samuels The "Right to Copy" Doctrine – Perry J. Saidman Determining the Likelihood of Confusion in Ex parte Examination: A Trademark Examining Attorney’s Perspective – Paula B. Mays Application of the Festo Framework in Four Recent Appeal Cases – Magda Carvalho Letter to the Editor Obviously Troublesome: How High Should the Standard be for Obtaining a Patent – Michael [...]