Blind Consent? A Social Psychological Investigation of Non-Readership of Click-Through Agreements

Abstract  Across two studies we aimed to measure empirically the extent of non-readership of click-through agreements (CTAs), identify
the dominant beliefs about CTAs contributing to non-readership, and experimentally manipulate these [...]

Mental Sets in Conduct Problem Youth with Psychopathic Features: Entity Versus Incremental Theories of Intelligence

Abstract  The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of a motivational intervention on conduct problem youth with psychopathic
features. Specifically, the current study examined conduct problem youths’ mental set (or [...]



The Self-Regulation Model of Sexual Offending: Relationship to Risk and Need

Abstract  In the present study, we evaluated the validity and utility of the self-regulation model in a sample of 275 adult male sexual
offenders treated within the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC). Individuals following different [...]

A Bayesian Approach to the Group Versus Individual Prediction Controversy in Actuarial Risk Assessment

Abstract  Recent attempts to indict the use of actuarial risk assessment instruments have relied on confidence intervals to demonstrate
that risk estimates derived at the group level do not necessarily apply to any specific individual [...]

Field Reliability of the SAVRY with Juvenile Probation Officers: Implications for Training

Abstract  Two complimentary studies were conducted to investigate the inter-rater reliability and performance of juvenile justice personnel
when conducting the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk for Youth (SAVRY). Study 1 reports the [...]



Do PCL-R Scores from State or Defense Experts Best Predict Future Misconduct Among Civilly Committed Sex Offenders?

Abstract  In a recent study of sex offender civil commitment proceedings, Murrie et al. (Psychol Public Policy Law 15:19–53, 2009) found
that state-retained experts consistently assigned higher PCL-R total scores than defense-retained [...]

You Have the Right to Understand: The Deleterious Effect of Stress on Suspects’ Ability to Comprehend Miranda

Abstract  
Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436, 1966) required that suspects be explicitly warned of the right to avoid self-incrimination and the right to legal representation.
This research was designed to examine whether stress, induced [...]

Assessing Children’s Competency to Take the Oath in Court: The Influence of Question Type on Children’s Accuracy

Abstract  This study examined children’s accuracy in response to truth–lie competency questions asked in court. The participants included
164 child witnesses in criminal child sexual abuse cases tried in Los Angeles County over a 5-year [...]

If Anything Else Comes to Mind… Better Keep It to Yourself? Delayed Recall is Discrediting—Unjustifiably

Abstract  Inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts are perceived as indicative of inaccuracy and reduce the witnesses’ credibility. Reminiscence,
the delayed recall of previously not recalled information, is generally interpreted as a type [...]

Predictors of Eyewitness Identification Decisions from Video Lineups in England: A Field Study

Abstract  Eyewitness identification decisions from 1,039 real lineups in England were analysed. Identification procedures have undergone
dramatic change in the United Kingdom over recent years. Video lineups are now standard procedure, in [...]