Abstract
This paper explores the UK’s legal interventions in the arena of forced marriage. Three key initiatives have been considered
in the last 5 years: creating a specific crime of forced marriage; civil rather than criminal protection for victims; and
an increase in the age of entry for non-EU spouses, with a corresponding increase in age for sponsoring such spouses. Our
key focus is on the last of these interventions and we draw upon a research study conducted in the UK in 2006/2007 exploring
the risks and benefits associated with increasing the age of sponsorship and entry. The UK government’s argument is that the
increased maturity which comes from being older acts as a protective factor, thus making it easier to resist forced marriage.
This view of maturity gains its saliency from developmental psychology. Here, we critically analyse the construct of age and
the link between age and ability to resist forced marriage. We illustrate through the accounts of victims of forced marriage
and of stakeholders the difficulties of adopting age as a central organising feature of protection for potential victims of
forced marriage.
in the last 5 years: creating a specific crime of forced marriage; civil rather than criminal protection for victims; and
an increase in the age of entry for non-EU spouses, with a corresponding increase in age for sponsoring such spouses. Our
key focus is on the last of these interventions and we draw upon a research study conducted in the UK in 2006/2007 exploring
the risks and benefits associated with increasing the age of sponsorship and entry. The UK government’s argument is that the
increased maturity which comes from being older acts as a protective factor, thus making it easier to resist forced marriage.
This view of maturity gains its saliency from developmental psychology. Here, we critically analyse the construct of age and
the link between age and ability to resist forced marriage. We illustrate through the accounts of victims of forced marriage
and of stakeholders the difficulties of adopting age as a central organising feature of protection for potential victims of
forced marriage.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 267-288
- DOI 10.1007/s10691-009-9132-7
- Authors
- Geetanjali Gangoli, University of Bristol School for Policy Studies 8 Priory Road Bristol BS8 1TZ UK
- Khatidja Chantler, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work Room 4.309, Jean McFarlane Building, University Place, Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK
- Journal Feminist Legal Studies
- Online ISSN 1572-8455
- Print ISSN 0966-3622
- Journal Volume Volume 17
- Journal Issue Volume 17, Number 3
